-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Ralf Wildenhues on 12/4/2006 11:11 PM:
> Quoting automake/configure.ac:
> # The amount we should wait after modifying files depends on the platform.
> # On Windows '95, '98 and ME, files modifications have 2-seconds
> # granularity and can
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Even Linux
> supports FAT, although I doubt anyone is foolhardy enough to develop on
> FAT when there are so many better filesystems to choose from. But you
> need at least 'sleep 2' to guarantee distinct timestamps on FAT.
I don't think this is really a
* Paul Eggert wrote on Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 06:21:42PM CET:
>
> In the mean time, sleeping for 1 second should suffice.
Thank you. I applied the patch below, assuming we'll hear about
the significance of failures on bug-autoconf.
> The goal here is to avoid a tradition of tests that sleep. Sle
Hello Ralf and all,
[sorry for the delay, I forgot this in my "postponed" folder]
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 01:35:54PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Stepan Kasal wrote on Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 12:40:18PM CET:
> > [...] So it seems that distcheck would
> > catch more bugs if `_build' were not a
