Re: [PATCH 0/9] Extend and improve tests on Automake's silent-mode

2010-06-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Stefano, * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 11:53:43PM CEST: > Here I (re)propose a series of patches to improve and extend the tests > on Automake's silent-mode. Thanks. > This series is an extension/improvement over my previous patch > series "[PATCH 0/5] Modularize testing o

Re: Comment on introduction pages

2010-06-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Christina, * Christina Gratorp wrote on Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 08:58:53AM CEST: > I have a suggestion that would make a difference when visiting your > otherwise eminent website: > http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html#Introduction. The sentence > "The developer expresses the recipe

Update AUTHORS.

2010-06-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
I guess it was about time I added this. Cheers, Ralf * AUTHORS: Update. diff --git a/AUTHORS b/AUTHORS index f1cd414..e63f8b7 100644 --- a/AUTHORS +++ b/AUTHORS @@ -15,3 +15,7 @@ Alexandre Oliva Alexandre Duret-Lutz Major overhaul of everything. Maintenance since 2002. + +Ralf Wildenh

Re: [PATCH] Enable `errexit' shell flag in various tests.

2010-06-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Stefano, * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 02:33:14PM CEST: > Here is another simple patch which ought to make the use of the > `errexit' shell flag in the testsuite more consistent. This one affects > a larger number of files, but since the changes are all similar and all >

Re: [PATCH] Enable `errexit' shell flag in all tests cxx*.test.

2010-06-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:40:44PM CEST: > Here is another simple patch which ought to make the use of the > `errexit' shell flag in the testsuite more consistent. > Enable `errexit' shell flag in all tests cxx*.test. > > * tests/cxx.test: Add call to `set -e'. Related

Re: [PATCH] Enable `errexit' shell flag in some test scripts.

2010-06-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Stefano, * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, May 06, 2010 at 01:45:10PM CEST: > Enable the `errexit' shell flag in another bunch of test scripts. > > No relevant semantic change should be introduced by the patch, except > for the test `discover.test', which has been made slighty stricter > w.r

Re: [PATCH] Improve tests link*.test (enable `set -e').

2010-06-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, May 08, 2010 at 02:29:13AM CEST: > * tests/link_c_cxx.test: Enable `errexit shell flag, and related > changes. Also, do not create useless source files. > * tests/link_dist.test: Likewise. > * tests/link_f90_only.test: Likewise. > * tests/link_f_only.test: Likewis

Re: [BIKESHEDDING PATCH] Generated tests are now just a thin layer around other tests.

2010-06-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Stefano, * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 02:07:19PM CEST: > What about the attached new try? It just complicates the generated > tests a little bit, but this is a more than fair tradeoff IMO. That looks like a better idea to me. However, 'return' from a script sourced with

More minor message fixes.

2010-06-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
This patch picks up a couple more obvious message fixes. Committing to master. Cheers, Ralf More minor message fixes. * aclocal.in (scan_file): Fix recommended info command line. * automake.in (handle_lib_objects): No need to prepend function name to prog_error message. (

Re: [PATCH] Enable `errexit' shell flag in some test scripts.

2010-06-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, May 06, 2010 at 01:45:10PM CEST: > No relevant semantic change should be introduced by the patch, except > for the test `discover.test', which has been made slighty stricter > w.r.t. the exit status of Automake (a non-zero exit status is > expected) and the grep

Re: [BIKESHEDDING PATCH] Generated tests are now just a thin layer around other tests.

2010-06-06 Thread Stefano Lattarini
At Sunday 06 June 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 02:07:19PM CEST: > > What about the attached new try? It just complicates the > > generated tests a little bit, but this is a more than fair > > tradeoff IMO. > > That looks like

Re: [PATCH] Enable `errexit' shell flag in some test scripts.

2010-06-06 Thread Stefano Lattarini
At Sunday 06 June 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > > The involved test scripts and the modifications done to them are > > simple enough that no portability problem involving the `errexit' > > flag should have been introduced. > > Not quite right in this case. OpenBSD sh fails ext

Re: [BIKESHEDDING PATCH] Generated tests are now just a thin layer around other tests.

2010-06-06 Thread Stefano Lattarini
At Sunday 06 June 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 02:07:19PM CEST: > > What about the attached new try? It just complicates the > > generated tests a little bit, but this is a more than fair > > tradeoff IMO. > > That looks like

Re: [BIKESHEDDING PATCH] Generated tests are now just a thin layer around other tests.

2010-06-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 07:13:48PM CEST: > At Sunday 06 June 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 02:07:19PM CEST: > > > What about the attached new try? It just complicates the > > > generated tests a little bit, but this is

Re: [BIKESHEDDING PATCH] Generated tests are now just a thin layer around other tests.

2010-06-06 Thread Stefano Lattarini
At Sunday 06 June 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > Thanks, and sorry for not having rerun the complete testsuite > before pushing the original patch. Well, I should say "sorry" for not having tested the patch thoroughly. Thanks for your quick response. Stefano

A few more perl code coverage patches

2010-06-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
I'm merging a handful of trivial patches increasing coverage of the Automake perl code, to master. Cheers, Ralf Coverage for aclocal diagnosing underquoted macros. * tests/acloca23.test: New test. * tests/Makefile.am: Update. diff --git a/tests/Makefile.am b/tests/Makefile.am in

Re: [PATCH] Overhauled and modularized tests in `instspc.test'.

2010-06-06 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Here we go again. The last version of the patch is still wrong, at it doesn't handle correctly the situation where $(srcdir) is different at developer's 'make dist' time and at user's 'make check' time. A similar problem has been spotted by Ralf Wildenhues in a previous patch of mine (that should

Re: [PATCH] Overhauled and modularized tests in `instspc.test'.

2010-06-06 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Damn, the last patch contained a stupid typo, probably introduced by myself in the amending process, god knows how. Sorry for the noise. Stefano From b1a3ed602e7e2b35a11ff9f480a07ad704040347 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stefano Lattarini Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 18:38:27 +0200 Subject: [PATCH

[PATCH] Make test `ammissing.test' stricter.

2010-06-06 Thread Stefano Lattarini
* tests/ammissing.test: Fail if $ACLOCAL succeds unexpectedly. Enable `errexit' shell flag. -*-*-*- No portability problems should be introduced w.r.t. the errexit shell flag: there are no compound commands, and the only potentially problematic construct is: $ACLOCAL 2>stderr && { cat stderr

Re: [BIKESHEDDING PATCH] Generated tests are now just a thin layer around other tests.

2010-06-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 07:50:57PM CEST: > At Sunday 06 June 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > Thanks, and sorry for not having rerun the complete testsuite > > before pushing the original patch. > Well, I should say "sorry" for not having tested the patch thoroughly.

Re: [BIKESHEDDING PATCH] Generated tests are now just a thin layer around other tests.

2010-06-06 Thread Stefano Lattarini
At Sunday 06 June 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 07:50:57PM CEST: > > At Sunday 06 June 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > Thanks, and sorry for not having rerun the complete testsuite > > > before pushing the original patch. > > > > Well, I shoul