At Sunday 20 June 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:03:33PM CEST:
> > Another improvements to 'tests/defs', factored out from my
> > on-going refactoring of test scripts setup. This time it is
> > (should be) a real improvement, no
At Sunday 20 June 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Thanks. There is a typo diagnositic in the comments.
Fixed.
> The test doesn't look safe for MinGW. Its 'ln -s' is emulated by
> 'cp -p' which, from looking at the test, will cause a failure not
> a skip.
Why? The test is skipped if `ln -s NONE
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 09:53:17PM CEST:
> I ping this again, since I'm pretty sure it has fallen off your radar.
>
> I say so because, since the last ping, you have applied (or at least
> commented) much bigger and potentially more invasive patches of mine,
> but not t
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:47:10PM CEST:
> Yet another testsuite-tweaking patch (the last one for today).
> Modernize, improve and extend tests `suffix*.test'.
>
> * tests/suffix3.test: Enable `errexit' shell flag, and related
> changes.
> * tests/suffix4.test: Likewise.
Hi Stefano,
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:03:33PM CEST:
> Another improvements to 'tests/defs', factored out from my on-going
> refactoring of test scripts setup. This time it is (should be) a real
> improvement, not just a cosmetic one.
I see your point, but do you have
