On 6/21/2010 5:00 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Den 2010-06-19 05:38 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
>> * Peter Rosin wrote on Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:30:22PM CEST:
>>> Should I keep attaching the "current" version of the patch?
>>
>> Sure, but the patch is good to go once copyright papers are through,
>> with t
* Peter Rosin wrote on Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:07:19AM CEST:
> I have now run the test-suite once without the patch and once with
> the patch. There was only one difference (that seem totally
> unrelated). When I run that test by itself it behaves the same both
> with and without the patch so I'll
Den 2010-06-19 05:38 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
* Peter Rosin wrote on Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:30:22PM CEST:
Should I keep attaching the "current" version of the patch?
Sure, but the patch is good to go once copyright papers are through,
with testing added.
Here's the latest round, with a couple
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 11:07:01PM CEST:
> At Sunday 20 June 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:03:33PM CEST:
> > > Another improvements to 'tests/defs', factored out from my
> > > on-going refactoring of test scripts setu
Hi Stefano,
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 05:04:22PM CEST:
> * tests/cscope.test: Improve and normalize generation and names
> of source files.
> Do not use hackish, belated SKIPs anymore.
> Slighty extend existing tests.
> (configure.in): Do not call macro `AM_PROG_GCJ' anymor
Hi Stefano,
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 10:27:26PM CEST:
> At Sunday 20 June 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > The test doesn't look safe for MinGW. Its 'ln -s' is emulated by
> > 'cp -p' which, from looking at the test, will cause a failure not
> > a skip.
> Why? The test
Hi Stefano,
I'm falling more and more behind on patches, it seems.
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, May 01, 2010 at 10:33:46AM CEST:
> The Automake manual states in:
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Flag-Variables-Ordering.html
> (and the good sense dictates) that all
On 6/21/2010 6:33 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>
> So, what stops someone from adding the missing conversion when it
> is needed, thus fulfilling the promise implied by the name of the
> function?
Nothing. And then they update the documentation to match the
implementation.
--
Chuck
Hi Chuck,
Den 2010-06-19 22:09 skrev Charles Wilson:
func_path_conv() assumes that you ALWAYS want to convert from "something
unixish" to win32. If that's the case -- e.g. it appears to only ever
be called from inside func_cl_wrapper, for which that would always be
true -- then it needs to be d
Hi Ralf!
Den 2010-06-14 22:40 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
[ adding automake-patches; this is
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.general/10927/focus=10954 ]
* Peter Rosin wrote on Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 09:35:45AM CEST:
Den 2010-06-12 10:05 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
Well, I sort of figure
10 matches
Mail list logo
