Re: [PATCH 0/3] Some improvments to cscope support and testing

2010-08-05 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Hello Ralf. Ping on this? It seems to me that most issues with this patch series had already been solved, so it's probably a pity to let it bitrotting here... Regards, Stefano

Re: [PATCH] New tests on obsoleted usages of automake/autoconf macros.

2010-08-05 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Hello Ralf. Ping on this? It seems to me that most issues with this patch had already been solved, so it's probably a pity to let it bitrotting here... Regards, Stefano

Re: [PATCH] Modernize, improve and/or extend tests `colon*.test.

2010-08-05 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Hello Ralf. Ping on this? It seems to me that most issues with this patch had already been solved, so it's probably a pity to let it bitrotting here... Regards, Stefano

Re: New auxiliary archive script

2010-08-05 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Peter Rosin wrote on Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 11:10:38AM CEST: Den 2010-08-04 22:18 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: Now if you insist, then maybe we can just find another compromise name. Please set $me to the name and use that throughout, so at least a change is easily done. ;-) I'm perfectly fine

Re: New auxiliary archive script

2010-08-05 Thread Peter Rosin
Hi Ralf, Den 2010-08-01 20:06 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: For actual applicability, it is sufficient if you provide a working script, post testsuite results with it in place (you might want to MAKE='make AR=...' When I do MAKE='make AR=/path/to/archive lib' make AR=/path/to/archive lib check

[PATCH] Work around a nasty bug of Solaris make (was: Segmentation fault with Solaris /usr/xpg4/bin/make)

2010-08-05 Thread Stefano Lattarini
At Thursday 05 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hello Stefano, * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 07:40:15PM CEST: The test `parallel-tests9.test' fails on Solaris 10 when using /usr/xpg4/bin/make as $MAKE, due to a submake invocation returning an exit status `139'

Re: [PATCH] Work around a nasty bug of Solaris make

2010-08-05 Thread Eric Blake
On 08/05/2010 04:44 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: Thanks for the report. A segfault in make is always a bug in the make implementation. If we can easily find out what makes it fail, and can easily and reliably work around it, then let's maybe consider it, but otherwise let's not bother. The

Re: [PATCH] Work around a nasty bug of Solaris make

2010-08-05 Thread Stefano Lattarini
[Dropping bug-autom...@gnu.org] Hi Eric. Thanks for the review. At Friday 06 August 2010, Eric Blake wrote: On 08/05/2010 04:44 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: Thanks for the report. A segfault in make is always a bug in the make implementation. If we can easily find out what makes it

Re: New auxiliary archive script

2010-08-05 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Peter Rosin wrote on Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 12:00:53AM CEST: Den 2010-08-01 20:06 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: For actual applicability, it is sufficient if you provide a working script, post testsuite results with it in place (you might want to MAKE='make AR=...' When I do MAKE='make