On Thursday 09 September 2010, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> Ouch. I forgot to regenerate Makefile.in from Makefile.am before
> pushing to maint the two last commits. This follow-up patch fixes
> that. Pushed to maint.
Also, merged latest (fixed) maint into master & branch-1.11 (and
pushed), becau
Hi Jeff. Thanks for the report.
On Thursday 09 September 2010, Jeff wrote:
> I feel a bit silly pointing out something so trivial,
Well, I feel a bit sloppy not to having noticed it myself ;-)
> but while looking at my configure --help output, I notice that
> the help messages generated for AM_S
[ dropping automake@ ]
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 05:34:48PM CEST:
> Ralf, what about the attached patch (for master)? It still lacks
> testsuite exposure and ChangeLog entry, but I'm in a hurry right
> now. More this evening or tomorrow.
Okay with a proper log entry, and
This is what I pushed.
Thanks,
Stefano
From d76d91ae1b12c4730dc897cdb25a1d41af499ac0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefano Lattarini
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 17:24:13 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Use AS_HELP_STRING in AM_SILENT_RULES.
* m4/silent.m4 (AM_SILENT_RULES): Use `AS_HELP_STRING' to format
he
Hi Stefano,
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 10:58:19PM CEST:
> Since the patch series "Fix/improve requirements declaration for test
> scripts" is starting to fall hopelessly out of sync with the state of
> the master branch (and this situation will only be worsened by the
> on-
On Thursday 09 September 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > OK for maint?
>
> Yes. Thanks.
Pushed (not merged to master or branch-1.11).
> If you have a suggested order in which I should look at pending
> patch series of yours, feel free to post it.
Will do shortly.
Thanks,
Stefano
Hi Ralf. As you asked, I report here what would be, in my opinion,
the preferred order of review for the still-pending patches of mine.
I also add some details on the patches, where I think that might help.
1. [PATCH] "Work around a bug in Solaris make's file-inclusion
mechanism."
> Okay with a proper log entry, and crediting Jeff for the bug report,
> including addition to THANKS (unless Jeff rejects that).
> No need for testsuite exposure.
Credit is always appreciated, thank you.
Jeff
