I've now pushed the patch to master.
Regards,
Stefano
On Thursday 16 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 01:27:10AM CET:
On Wednesday 15 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
[ magic strings ]
Why all the variation in these? That makes the tests harder to read.
I'd rather not change the
I've now pushed the patch to maint, and merged maint into master.
Regards,
Stefano
Pushed to master now.
Regards,
Stefano
Hello automakers.
Here it is one of the last (5 or 6) testsuite-only patches I have in
my repository.
Tested successfully:
- Debian GNU/Linux, system GNU make (3.81) bash (4.1), gcc 4.4.4,
libtool 2.2.6b, autoconf 2.68.
- Debian GNU/Linux, GNU make 3.79, dash (0.5.5.1), gcc 4.0.1,
I'm seeing this in master now:
../automake/tests/remake11.test:makefiles_am_list=`find . -name Makefile.am |
LC_ALL=C sort`
../automake/tests/remake11.test:makefiles_list=`echo $makefiles_am_list | sed
's/\.am$//'`
Do not run make in the above tests. Use $MAKE instead.
Makefile:1090: recipe
On Thursday 16 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/canon7.test
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+# Stress test on canonicalization.
[...]
+cat Makefile.am 'END'
+noinst_PROGRAMS = dummy_static dummy_dynamic ,foo-bar
+noinst_LIBRARIES = libb.az+baz.a
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 06:41:46PM CET:
Ping on this? Reference:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2010-09/msg00106.html
The updated patch is attached. I will push it in 72 hours (by tuesday
evening) unless there are objections.
--- /dev/null
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 08:16:25PM CET:
On Thursday 16 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
--- a/tests/canon7.test
+++ b/tests/canon7.test
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ dummy_dynamic_SOURCES = $(dummy_static_SOURCES)
dummy_static_LDADD = $(noinst_LIBRARIES)
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 07:54:05PM CET:
OK to apply to a temporary branch off of maint, and merge to master?
The patch is ok with nits addressed.
BTW, notice that I'm planning to further extend the Lex/Yacc tests
and make them more semantic, but that should be better
On Thursday 16 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 07:54:05PM CET:
OK to apply to a temporary branch off of maint, and merge to master?
The patch is ok with nits addressed.
I've addressed almost all of them, but I have a doubt about one
On Thursday 16 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 08:16:25PM CET:
On Thursday 16 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
--- a/tests/canon7.test
+++ b/tests/canon7.test
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ dummy_dynamic_SOURCES = $(dummy_static_SOURCES)
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:10:29PM CET:
On Thursday 16 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
BTW, notice that I'm planning to further extend the Lex/Yacc tests
and make them more semantic, but that should be better done in a
follow-up patch IMVHO.
If
13 matches
Mail list logo