A small testsuite patch which slightly increases coverage of
Automake Yacc support. OK for the temporary branch yacc-work
(which at this point could as well be made public maybe), to
be merged into master?
I will push in 72 hours if there are no objections.
Regards,
Stefano
-*-*-*-
tests:
Hello automakers.
The `silent-yacc*.test' and `silent-lex*.test' tests were testing
non-generic rules for C sources only, not for Lex/Yacc sources.
Also, the output emitted by automake-generated rules when updating
a yacc-generated header wasn't being tested anywhere.
The attached patch should
And the following diff should be squashed in:
-*-*-*-
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 75be7e9..b0610f6 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -3,7 +3,8 @@
tests: cover yacc target-specific flags, and `-v' flag handling
* tests/yacc-basic: Try also to build a parser
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 01:13:35PM CET:
A small testsuite patch which slightly increases coverage of
Automake Yacc support. OK for the temporary branch yacc-work
(which at this point could as well be made public maybe), to
be merged into master?
I will push in 72
On Friday 21 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 01:13:35PM CET:
A small testsuite patch which slightly increases coverage of
Automake Yacc support. OK for the temporary branch yacc-work
(which at this point could as well be made public
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:09:28PM CET:
Haven't looked in any detail yet, but while some things are better, the
number of failures is still very high. There's even a couple of runs
that hang in cscope3.test and tar2.test. :-(
The first one is fixed by the patch below.
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 09:02:34PM CET:
On Friday 21 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
What make implementation did you test this with? Was this on a real
Solaris,
Yes, with Solaris 10 XPG4 make (I've just re-checked, JTBS).
OTOH, the test passes with Solaris
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:08:13PM CET:
On Friday 21 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 09:02:34PM CET:
On Friday 21 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
What make implementation did you test this with? Was
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 01:16:35PM CET:
The `silent-yacc*.test' and `silent-lex*.test' tests were testing
non-generic rules for C sources only, not for Lex/Yacc sources.
Also, the output emitted by automake-generated rules when updating
a yacc-generated header
On Friday 21 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:08:13PM CET:
On Friday 21 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 09:02:34PM CET:
On Friday 21 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
On Friday 21 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 09:02:34PM CET:
On Friday 21 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
What make implementation did you test this with? Was this on a real
Solaris,
Yes, with Solaris 10 XPG4 make (I've
On 01/21/2011 01:57 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
http://autobuild.josefsson.org/automake/log-201101181921817456000.txt
On IRIX, the code from AC_PROG_LEX sees something like this:
$ cc -o conf lex.yy.c -ll
cc-1042 cc: ERROR File = conf.l, Line = 6
The types of operands char * and int are
12 matches
Mail list logo