Hi Ralf. Just a minor "linguistic" note ...
> > > It's nicer to avoid bugs than having to work around them.
> > >
> > I have to say that, when it comes to error checking, I tend to prefer
> > automation that warns me noisily (+1 if it also offers advices) to
> > automation that tries to second-gu
[dropping bug-autoconf]
On Wednesday 16 March 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> [ adding bug-autoconf ]
>
> * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 06:24:28AM CET:
> > So, can we just quote the argument so it's not detected by m4?
> >
> > me_quoted=`echo "$me" | sed 's,..,&@\&t@,g'`
> >
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 07:31:09PM CET:
> > > > It's nicer to avoid bugs than having to work around them.
> > > >
> > > I have to say that, when it comes to error checking, I tend to prefer
> > > automation that warns me noisily (+1 if it also offers advices) to
> > > auto
On Wednesday 16 March 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 07:31:09PM CET:
> > > > > It's nicer to avoid bugs than having to work around them.
> > > > >
> > > > I have to say that, when it comes to error checking, I tend to prefer
> > > > automation that
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 12:51:29PM CET:
> > Or maybe we could define a "maintainer-check" that looks at the
> > testcases' names and complains about suspicious ones... I'll
> > give it a shot unless someone beats me.
> >
> Done in the attached patch.
OK with nits address
