[FYI] {maint} news: update w.r.t. introduction of AM_DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS (was: Re: [PATCH] {maint} distcheck: add support for AM_DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS)

On Monday 13 June 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > On Friday 10 June 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > Reference: > > > > > > On Thursday 02 June 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > > Severity: wishlist > > > > > > Hello automakers. > > > > >

Re: [PATCH] {maint} distcheck: add support for AM_DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS (was: Re: bug#8784: Support developer-reserved AM_DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS)

On Friday 10 June 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > Reference: > > > On Thursday 02 June 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > Severity: wishlist > > > > Hello automakers. > > > > Continuing with the good trend of avoiding to impinge on the user >

[PATCH] {testsuite-work} tests: extend tests on `--add-missing' and `--copy' a bit

On Monday 13 June 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > References: > > > > I've pushed this patch now. > > Regards, > Stefano > I'd like also to a

[PATCH] {testsuite-work} tests: remove 'test_prefer_config_shell' from the environment (was: Re: [PATCH 3/3] {testsuite-work} tests: `lib/' shell scripts transparently tested also with $SHELL)

On Monday 06 June 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > With the previous commit, the user could prefer the use of $SHELL > over /bin/sh in some tests checking the Automake-provided shell > scripts by manually exporting `test_prefer_config_shell' to "yes" > in the environment. With this commit, we ensu

[PATCH] {testsuite-work} tests: autogenerate list of wrapped tests for `lib/' shell scripts (was: Re: [PATCH 3/3] {testsuite-work} tests: `lib/' shell scripts transparently tested also with $SHELL)

On Tuesday 07 June 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > On Tuesday 07 June 2011, Peter Rosin wrote: > > > + > > > +# FIXME: this list might probably be made auto-generated, like > > > +# $(parallel_tests) is... But would that worth the hassle? > > > +config_shell_tests = \ > > > + compile-w.shtst \ >

[FYI] {testsuite-work} tests: don't hard-code the test name in txinfo21.test

* tests/txinfo21.test: Use `$me' instead of hard-coding the current testcase name "txinfo21". Add a trailing `:' command since we are at it. --- ChangeLog |7 ++ tests/txinfo21.test | 54 ++ 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 26

[PATCH] {testsuite-work} [PATCH] tests: test mdate-sh with /bin/sh too

I will push this in 48 hours if there is no objection. Regards, Stefano From 1222bfbc2cbf164f7ece4ff952c6798a1d5eb585 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 Message-Id: <1222bfbc2cbf164f7ece4ff952c6798a1d5eb585.1307961304.git.stefano.lattar...@gmail.com> From: Stefano Lattarini Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:21:5

Re: [PATCH] {maint} Docs: better documentation for silent make rules.

On Thursday 09 June 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > Reference: > > > Ping on this? I've rebased the patch against latest maint, done some > rewordings, and reworked the example (now it's broken into two examples) > to b

Re: [PATCH] {maint} Warnings about primary/prefix mismatch fixed and extended.

On Monday 13 June 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > I've pushed the patch now. > > Regards, > Stefano > But the test `primary-prefix-invalid-couples.test' is really too slow. What about the attached follow-up patch to improve the situation? It slightly reduces coverage, but on my system brin