On 02/03/2013 09:33 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Reference:
http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=13435
On 01/28/2013 02:55 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
On 01/23/2013 01:16 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
I've pushed my attempt to the public rewindable branch
On 02/23/2013 06:47 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
On 02/14/2013 11:26 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
OK, done. If there are no further objections, I will soon proceed to
re-write the experimental/preproc branch once again with the latest
version of these patches;
This has been done already.
tags 13435 + moreinfo patch
thanks
On 03/05/2013 08:43 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
I won't hold you up. Since none of my folks thought it important
enough to take the time to test it, please just back-burner it. If
someone here needs the patch, they know where to find it.
OK. I just find it a
On 2013-03-05 14:43 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
I won't hold you up. Since none of my folks thought it important
enough to take the time to test it, please just back-burner it. If
someone here needs the patch, they know where to find it.
FWIW I tried to setup a DOS/DJGPP environment for testing
Basically, they are not really prototypes, but rather a trick to have
user-defined subroutines that behave more similarly to perl built-in
functions, by allowing them to be called without parentheses and to
impose context on their argument. Such semantics can be useful in some
selected
I won't hold you up. Since none of my folks thought it important
enough to take the time to test it, please just back-burner it. If
someone here needs the patch, they know where to find it.
Thanks!
