() Stefano Lattarini
() Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:33:08 +0200
Do you have an environment variable named 'd'? I like
minimalism, but this seems a little over-the-top ;-)
I live in Emacs and ‘C-x C-f $ d RET’ is a nice way to get there
quickly. Attached is ~/.directory-env-vars just so you see h
Automake 1.12 "make check" reported only one FAIL, which
i traced to a strange value for var 'd' in t/remake11.sh,
leaking in from the environment. You can probably guess
its value from this test-suite.log excerpt:
test-suite.log-EXCERPT
Description: Binary data
Anyway, here's the trivial patc
>From 0e4ec03ceaf2f67a62f3f2a3a168ce7236f77212 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thien-Thi Nguyen
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 16:53:33 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] doc: mention ext reversal on pattern- to suffix-rule conversion
* doc/automake.texi (Suffixes): Mention order reversal when
converting GNU make pattern rule to Automake suf
() Ralf Wildenhues
() Tue, 17 Aug 2010 21:33:15 +0200
there are a couple of reasons I'd prefer a
slightly different example: [reasons]
Thanks for the prompt review; i agree redundant overlap is undesirable.
[...] SUFFIXES [...]
Ack.
Can we find a transformation that is known to mo
