Re: [FYI] {maint} news: Automake 1.13 will require Autoconf >= 2.65

2012-05-01 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Hi Dave. On 05/01/2012 01:30 AM, Dave Hart wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 19:45, Stefano Lattarini > wrote: >> + - Autoconf 2.65 or later will be required by the next major Automake >> +version (1.13). Until now, Automake has been working with any >> +Autoconf version up to 2.62. >> +

Re: [FYI] {maint} news: Automake 1.13 will require Autoconf >= 2.65

2012-04-30 Thread Dave Hart
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 19:45, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > +  - Autoconf 2.65 or later will be required by the next major Automake > +    version (1.13).  Until now, Automake has been working with any > +    Autoconf version up to 2.62. > + Presumably you meant to write "Until now, Automake has re

[FYI] {maint} news: Automake 1.13 will require Autoconf >= 2.65

2012-04-30 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Autoconf 2.65 is almost three years old now, so requiring it is acceptable. Also, the soon-to-appear support for Objective C++ in Automake will be simplified if we can assume that Autoconf version (which is the one that introduced support for Objective C++). * NEWS (Planned future backward-incomp