On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 07:02:58PM +0200, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 July 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > But tools like autobuild have another requirement: they would like to be
> > able to detect, as reliably as possible, some statistics based on
> > whatever output is thrown at
On Thursday 07 July 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> [SNIP longish discussion I'd like to keep for a later date]
>
> > You mean want them *even in the test-suite.log*?
>
> Hmm. --color is good enough, if it forces color on stdout, IMVHO.
>
Point is, it doesn't. It only tells that the colors are
On Wednesday 06 July 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 02:49:15PM CEST:
> > On Wednesday 06 July 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 03:31:22PM CEST:
> > > > Prefer a more deterministic, "tabular" format
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 02:49:15PM CEST:
> On Wednesday 06 July 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 03:31:22PM CEST:
> > > Prefer a more deterministic, "tabular" format for the testsuite
> > > summary, always listing the numbe
On Wednesday 06 July 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 03:31:22PM CEST:
> > Prefer a more deterministic, "tabular" format for the testsuite
> > summary, always listing the numbers of passed, failed, xfailed,
> > xpassed, skipped and er
Hi Stefano,
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 03:31:22PM CEST:
> Prefer a more deterministic, "tabular" format for the testsuite
> summary, always listing the numbers of passed, failed, xfailed,
> xpassed, skipped and errored tests, even when these numbers are
> zero. This simplif
