[PATCH] {maint} Improve and extend tests on de-ansification support.

But since we are at it, we can do better, extending coverage and making existing tests more "semantic". See the attached patch (for maint). Regards, Stefano From 9e325c40fcd0d768eb3f30ba906406202f4870d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stefano Lattarini Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 09:01:45 +0200 Sub

Re: [PATCH] {maint} Improve and extend tests on de-ansification support.

Pinging this patch again, following this: There should be no need to rebase the patch (which is based off of maint), so that I should just be able to merge it to master from the copy in my local automake repository (maybe

Re: [PATCH] {maint} Improve and extend tests on de-ansification support.

Hi Stefano, * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:59:22AM CEST: > But since we are at it, we can do better, extending coverage and > making existing tests more "semantic". See the attached patch (for > maint). ansi2knr is a really dying (and ugly) feature; when have we last seen

Re: [PATCH] {maint} Improve and extend tests on de-ansification support.

On Sunday 14 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:59:22AM CEST: > > But since we are at it, we can do better, extending coverage and > > making existing tests more "semantic". See the attached patch (for > > maint). > > ans

Re: [PATCH] {maint} Improve and extend tests on de-ansification support.

* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 02:37:13AM CET: > On Sunday 14 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:59:22AM CEST: > > > But since we are at it, we can do better, extending coverage and > > > making existing tests more "sem

Re: [PATCH] {maint} Improve and extend tests on de-ansification support.

On Monday 15 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 02:37:13AM CET: > > On Sunday 14 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:59:22AM CEST: > > > > But since we are at it, we can do better, ex

Re: [PATCH] {maint} Improve and extend tests on de-ansification support.

* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:15:12AM CET: > On Monday 15 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > Well then we should adjust maintainer-check to not complain. Either > > way, maintainer-check results should not deteriorate. > I'm not keen on meddling with the current

maintainer checks (was: Re: [PATCH] {maint} Improve and extend tests on de-ansification support.)

On Saturday 20 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:15:12AM CET: > > On Monday 15 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > > > Well then we should adjust maintainer-check to not complain. Either > > > way, maintainer-check results shoul