Re: [PATCH] {yacc-work} coverage: more on 'yacc -d' and recovery from deleted headers

2011-01-29 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 02:48:12PM CET: > On Saturday 29 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > (automake will not produce a rule for some target if you put a > > rule for that target in the Makefile.am, even if your rule does > > not contain commands; > > > JFTR: I neve

Re: [PATCH] {yacc-work} coverage: more on 'yacc -d' and recovery from deleted headers

2011-01-29 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Saturday 29 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 02:20:00PM CET: > > On Saturday 29 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > I agree with everything except ... > > > > > > > BUILT_SOURCES = parse1.h p2-parse2.h > > > > +main3.@OBJEXT@: pars

Re: [PATCH] {yacc-work} coverage: more on 'yacc -d' and recovery from deleted headers

2011-01-29 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 02:20:00PM CET: > On Saturday 29 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > I agree with everything except ... > > > > > BUILT_SOURCES = parse1.h p2-parse2.h > > > +main3.@OBJEXT@: parse3.h > > > > ... this line shouldn't be there, other than to wo

Re: [PATCH] {yacc-work} coverage: more on 'yacc -d' and recovery from deleted headers

2011-01-29 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Saturday 29 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 01:48:16PM CET: > > On Saturday 29 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > FYI, I think the test has some overlap with one of the make -n tests > > > that ensures the deleted header recovery d

Re: [PATCH] {yacc-work} coverage: more on 'yacc -d' and recovery from deleted headers

2011-01-29 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 01:48:16PM CET: > On Saturday 29 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > FYI, I think the test has some overlap with one of the make -n tests > > that ensures the deleted header recovery doesn't build files in dry > > run mode. > > > Not exactly; i

Re: [PATCH] {yacc-work} coverage: more on 'yacc -d' and recovery from deleted headers

2011-01-29 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Saturday 29 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 05:01:11PM CET: > > OK for the 'yacc-work' branch? I will push in 72 hours if > > there's no objection. > > OK with nits addressed. > > FYI, I think the test has some overlap with one of the m

Re: [PATCH] {yacc-work} coverage: more on 'yacc -d' and recovery from deleted headers

2011-01-29 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 05:01:11PM CET: > OK for the 'yacc-work' branch? I will push in 72 hours if > there's no objection. OK with nits addressed. FYI, I think the test has some overlap with one of the make -n tests that ensures the deleted header recovery doesn't buil

[PATCH] {yacc-work} coverage: more on 'yacc -d' and recovery from deleted headers

2011-01-28 Thread Stefano Lattarini
OK for the 'yacc-work' branch? I will push in 72 hours if there's no objection. Regards, Stefano -*-*- coverage: more on 'yacc -d' and recovery from deleted headers * tests/yacc-deleted-headers.test: New test. * tests/Makefile.am (TESTS): Update. --- ChangeLog |6