Hmpf. No, the patch is still broken, and the tests are incomplete.
Please disregard it; I will post a new version later.
Thanks,
Stefano
Hi Stefano,
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 07:00:08PM CEST:
Note that I have not yet run the whole testsuite on this change; I will if
you tell me you're interested in the patch.
I'm intrigued by the fact that there appears to be a bug in the current
implementation. I agree
Hi Ralf. Sorry you missed my last drop this message...
At Friday 13 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Stefano,
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 07:00:08PM CEST:
Note that I have not yet run the whole testsuite on this change;
I will if you tell me you're interested
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 07:38:13PM CEST:
Hi Ralf. Sorry you missed my last drop this message...
I didn't. I just hoped the post might be helpful anyway. Just ignore
it if it distracts you.
At Friday 13 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Why are you not
At Friday 13 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 07:38:13PM CEST:
Hi Ralf. Sorry you missed my last drop this message...
I didn't. I just hoped the post might be helpful anyway.
And it is. The sorry was addressed to you (sorry if I made
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 01:18:14AM CEST:
At Friday 13 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 07:38:13PM CEST:
At Friday 13 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Why are you not suggesting AM_MISSING_PROG([AUTOM4TE],
.
Regards,
Stefano
From f3412499761b6c2fdc8eee64972b3c3aca2bcd81 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefano Lattarini stefano.lattar...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 18:57:25 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Improve support for non-default autotools in rebuild rules.
* lib/am/configure.am (%MAKEFILE
