* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 02:31:55PM CEST:
> At Sunday 08 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 01:36:57PM CEST:
> > > * tests/all.test: Run aclocal only once. Minor cosmetic changes.
> > > Move checks that several *-local
At Sunday 08 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 01:36:57PM CEST:
> > * tests/all.test: Run aclocal only once. Minor cosmetic changes.
> > Move checks that several *-local's in a single rule work ...
>
> This sentence does not make sense to me.
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 01:36:57PM CEST:
> * tests/all.test: Run aclocal only once. Minor cosmetic changes.
> Move checks that several *-local's in a single rule work ...
This sentence does not make sense to me. Maybe a missing word?
> * tests/manylocal.test: ... in th
local.test
From 7bcd657530939fa5cc901627064c7607d7099daf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefano Lattarini
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:33:49 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Separate failing part of test `all.test'.
* tests/all.test: Run aclocal only once. Minor cosmetic changes.
Move checks that several *
