Salut Alexandre,
Thanks for the feedback:
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> * LIBOBJDIR seems worthy to document from the Autoconf user perspective.
> Non-automake might also benefit from this; and we should avoid using
> undocumented interfaces in Automake.
Okay, I've added that to the attached
Some quick comments. I'm in a hurry. And before I forget:
thanks for working on this.
* LIBOBJDIR seems worthy to document from the Autoconf user perspective.
Non-automake might also benefit from this; and we should avoid using
undocumented interfaces in Automake.
* The Automake manual shoul
"Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2004-04-20 Gary V. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * lib/autoconf/general.m4 (_AC_LIBOBJS_NORMALIZE): Prepend each object
> named in LIBOBJS and LTLIBOBJS with the $(LIBOBJDIR), as set by latest
> automake.
That patch looks good
Salut Alexandre,
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
"Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Sorry, I think you are misunderstanding the purpose of
> AC_CONFIG_LIBOBJ_DIR. But you are breaking common uses of
> @LIBOBJS@ while bending it the way you think it should work. Or
> maybe
Salut Alexandre!
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> Gary> --- lib/autoconf/general.m4.orig 2003-10-27 11:10:56.0
> +
> Gary> +++ lib/autoconf/general.m42005-04-18 18:00:20.0 +0100
> Gary> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> Gary> # This file is part of Autoconf. -
Hi Gary,
>>> "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Gary> Hallo again,
Gary> It turns out that the automake patch is not enough :-(
Sorry, I think you are misunderstanding the purpose of
AC_CONFIG_LIBOBJ_DIR. But you are breaking common uses of
@LIBOBJS@ while bending it the way
Hi Paul,
Paul Eggert wrote:
> I like the patch from the Autoconf point of view, assuming the Automake
> folks take their bit.
Thanks.
> One small point:
>
> "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>+ac_libobj_dir=
>>+test "X${ac_config_libobj_dir-.}" != X. &&
>>+ ac_libobj_dir=`echo
I like the patch from the Autoconf point of view, assuming the Automake
folks take their bit. One small point:
"Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> +ac_libobj_dir=
> +test "X${ac_config_libobj_dir-.}" != X. &&
> + ac_libobj_dir=`echo "$ac_config_libobj_dir/" | sed 's,/*$,/,'`
That w
Hallo again,
It turns out that the automake patch is not enough :-(
Attached is an improved patch against automake-1.9.5 (applies to branch-1-9
and HEAD with fuzz). When applied, if configure.ac declares
AC_CONFIG_LIBOBJ_DIR, then automake will look in that directory for
AC_LIBSOURCE declared fi
Hallo!
While trying to convert libtool HEAD to use a single toplevel Makefile.am,
I discovered that neither branch-1-9 or HEAD of automake pay heed to the
AC_CONFIG_LIBOBJ_DIR declaration in configure.ac.
With this patch, using a single top-level Makefile.am, Libtool can now build
libltdl/libltdl
10 matches
Mail list logo