Hello Ralf.
At Friday 06 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
From 92020702ac9b8cde2ecfa248b5d34795d7209e44 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
2001 From: Stefano Lattarini stefano.lattar...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 00:40:55 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Work around a nasty bug (segfault) of Solaris
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 06:47:01PM CEST:
At Friday 06 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
From 92020702ac9b8cde2ecfa248b5d34795d7209e44 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
2001 From: Stefano Lattarini stefano.lattar...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 00:40:55 +0200
Subject:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 06:47:01PM CEST:
At Friday 06 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
From 92020702ac9b8cde2ecfa248b5d34795d7209e44 Mon Sep 17
00:00:00 2001 From: Stefano Lattarini
stefano.lattar...@gmail.com Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 00:40:55
+0200
Pushed to maint.
Regards,
Stefano
At Thursday 05 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Stefano,
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 07:40:15PM CEST:
The test `parallel-tests9.test' fails on Solaris 10 when using
/usr/xpg4/bin/make as $MAKE, due to a submake invocation
returning an exit status `139'
On 08/05/2010 04:44 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Thanks for the report. A segfault in make is always a bug in the
make implementation. If we can easily find out what makes it
fail, and can easily and reliably work around it, then let's maybe
consider it, but otherwise let's not bother.
The
[Dropping bug-autom...@gnu.org]
Hi Eric. Thanks for the review.
At Friday 06 August 2010, Eric Blake wrote:
On 08/05/2010 04:44 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Thanks for the report. A segfault in make is always a bug in
the make implementation. If we can easily find out what makes
it
