Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-03-06 09:03:
> On 03/06/2012 08:45 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> Peter Rosin skrev 2012-03-06 08:38:
>>> Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-03-05 21:05:
>>>
I'd like to see a little addition squashed-in if you can: a new
entry in 'tests/README' explaining that a "#defin
On 03/06/2012 08:45 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Peter Rosin skrev 2012-03-06 08:38:
>> Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-03-05 21:05:
>>
>>> I'd like to see a little addition squashed-in if you can: a new
>>> entry in 'tests/README' explaining that a "#define YY_NO_UNISTD_H"
>>> is needed in lex input file
Peter Rosin skrev 2012-03-06 08:38:
> Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-03-05 21:05:
>> Hi Peter.
>>
>> On 03/05/2012 03:10 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>> By default, GNU flex generates code that is dependent on unistd.h,
>>> which is not portable to non-ANSI systems causing spurious test
>>> failures.
>>>
Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-03-05 21:05:
> Hi Peter.
>
> On 03/05/2012 03:10 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> By default, GNU flex generates code that is dependent on unistd.h,
>> which is not portable to non-ANSI systems causing spurious test
>> failures.
>>
>> * tests/cond35.test (tscan.l): Define YY_
Hi Peter.
On 03/05/2012 03:10 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> By default, GNU flex generates code that is dependent on unistd.h,
> which is not portable to non-ANSI systems causing spurious test
> failures.
>
> * tests/cond35.test (tscan.l): Define YY_NO_UNISTD_H.
> * tests/lex-clean.test (lexer.l): Lik
By default, GNU flex generates code that is dependent on unistd.h,
which is not portable to non-ANSI systems causing spurious test
failures.
* tests/cond35.test (tscan.l): Define YY_NO_UNISTD_H.
* tests/lex-clean.test (lexer.l): Likewise.
* tests/lex-depend-cxx.test (joe.ll): Likewise.
* tests/lex
