Re: [PATCH 0/2] Bugfix w.r.t. $(AM_LFLAGS)/$(LFLAGS) and $(AM_YFLAGS)/$(YFLAGS) precedence.

At Thursday 24 June 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > I didn't mean to push the branch, unless it becomes a longer-lived > one which you might want to base work on. Ah, OK. I misunderstood, and though that you intended to publish the branch. I'm perfectly fine with not having it in the main reposit

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Bugfix w.r.t. $(AM_LFLAGS)/$(LFLAGS) and $(AM_YFLAGS)/$(YFLAGS) precedence.

* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 03:28:59PM CEST: > At Monday 21 June 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > I'm putting them in a new branch off of maint, and adding the > > following patch below to fix a couple of nits in them. > > I'm merging the branch to master for now, might me

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Bugfix w.r.t. $(AM_LFLAGS)/$(LFLAGS) and $(AM_YFLAGS)/$(YFLAGS) precedence.

Hello Ralf. At Monday 21 June 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > I'm putting them in a new branch off of maint, and adding the > following patch below to fix a couple of nits in them. > I'm merging the branch to master for now, might merge to > branch-1.11 later as well, I'm not quite sure yet.

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Bugfix w.r.t. $(AM_LFLAGS)/$(LFLAGS) and $(AM_YFLAGS)/$(YFLAGS) precedence.

* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 01:15:04PM CEST: > At Monday 21 June 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > I'm falling more and more behind on patches, it seems. > In this last period, it seems quite the opposite to me :-) > Thanks for your work! You've done most of the actual work, g

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Bugfix w.r.t. $(AM_LFLAGS)/$(LFLAGS) and $(AM_YFLAGS)/$(YFLAGS) precedence.

At Monday 21 June 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hi Stefano, > I'm falling more and more behind on patches, it seems. In this last period, it seems quite the opposite to me :-) Thanks for your work! I've just a minor nit about the follow-up patch... > Ensure generated C files contain a declarat

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Bugfix w.r.t. $(AM_LFLAGS)/$(LFLAGS) and $(AM_YFLAGS)/$(YFLAGS) precedence.

Hi Stefano, I'm falling more and more behind on patches, it seems. * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, May 01, 2010 at 10:33:46AM CEST: > The Automake manual states in: > > http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Flag-Variables-Ordering.html > (and the good sense dictates) that all

[PATCH 0/2] Bugfix w.r.t. $(AM_LFLAGS)/$(LFLAGS) and $(AM_YFLAGS)/$(YFLAGS) precedence.

Hello Automakers. The Automake manual states in: http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Flag-Variables-Ordering.html (and the good sense dictates) that all the flags specified in a $(FOOFLAGS) variable take precedence over the flags specified in the corresponding $(AM_FOOFLAGS) v