Re: [PATCH 1/7] Tests defs: various reorderings, some improvements.

2010-11-11 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Thursday 11 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:37:23AM CET: Well, the patch is almost just code reordering, with the very minor exceptions that: 1. in the older version, some error messages could be printed before `$me'

Re: [PATCH 1/7] Tests defs: various reorderings, some improvements.

2010-11-11 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 01:00:47PM CET: On Thursday 11 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Thank for respinning. The patches are ok then, but I think you should take care that the newly-introduced `pwd` is replaced by the variable you later introduce for this

Re: [PATCH 1/7] Tests defs: various reorderings, some improvements.

2010-11-10 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 04:00:47PM CET: This is basically just a reordering patch, which should organize the code in `tests/defs.in' in a clearer and more rational way. * tests/defs.in: Reordered various snippets of code in a clearer way. Improved a couple of error

Re: [PATCH 1/7] Tests defs: various reorderings, some improvements.

2010-11-10 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Wednesday 10 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 04:00:47PM CET: This is basically just a reordering patch, which should organize the code in `tests/defs.in' in a clearer and more rational way. * tests/defs.in: Reordered various

Re: [PATCH 1/7] Tests defs: various reorderings, some improvements.

2010-11-10 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:37:23AM CET: Well, the patch is almost just code reordering, with the very minor exceptions that: 1. in the older version, some error messages could be printed before `$me' was defined, so they couldn't use it; now `$me' is defined