Re: Partial linking with _RELOCATABLES - Proposed patch

2006-03-27 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "MA" == Marc Alff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MA> This is a proposed patch to use partial linking with Automake-1.9.6 Thanks for the proposal, I plan to look at it on saturday. 1.9.6 is a problem since this branch is two-year old. Old development is not on HEAD as explained on http://sourc

Re: Partial linking with _RELOCATABLES - Proposed patch (CVS)

2006-03-24 Thread Marc Alff
Hi All, Hi Alexandre Marc Alff wrote: Hi Alexandre, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: MA> This is a proposed patch to use partial linking with Automake-1.9.6 Thanks for the proposal, I plan to look at it on saturday. 1.9.6 is a problem since this branch is two-year old. Not a problem, I wi

Re: Partial linking with _RELOCATABLES - Proposed patch

2006-03-22 Thread Marc Alff
Hi Alexandre, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: MA> This is a proposed patch to use partial linking with Automake-1.9.6 Thanks for the proposal, I plan to look at it on saturday. 1.9.6 is a problem since this branch is two-year old. Not a problem, I will look at the CVS code base and see how

Re: Partial linking with _RELOCATABLES - Proposed patch

2006-03-20 Thread Marc Alff
Marc Alff wrote: This mail contains the patch only, the discussion is on automake --at-- gnu.org The post for the discussion is here : http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2006-03/msg00042.html Cheers, Marc Alff.

Partial linking with _RELOCATABLES - Proposed patch

2006-03-19 Thread Marc Alff
Hi all This is a proposed patch to use partial linking with Automake-1.9.6 This mail contains the patch only, the discussion is on automake@gnu.org A copy of the patch is also available for download at : http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=160169 I will provide later versions