bug#59991: [PATCH v2 0/3] Port tests to modern C

2023-11-15 Thread Karl Berry
Subject: [bug#59991] [PATCH v2 0/3] Port tests to modern C I believe this "header patch" 59991 can be closed (so doing), since 59992, 59993, and 60962 have been merged. The related flex patch 59994 has also been merged. Let me know if anything along these lines is outstanding. --thanks, karl.

[bug#59991] [PATCH v2 0/3] Port tests to modern C

2023-02-06 Thread Frederic Berat
Yes, they got separated bug IDs, next time I should probably consider modifying the patch headers so that they are sent in reply to the cover letter. The first patch has been merged ( https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=59992). The second has been divided in 2: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cg

[bug#59991] [PATCH v2 0/3] Port tests to modern C

2023-02-04 Thread Karl Berry
However, neither in this mail, nor in your original did I find a corresponding patch. Hi Jim - they ended up with separate bug#s, since separate emails. At least I think these are those: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=59992 (applied by mike?) https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugr

[bug#59991] [PATCH v2 0/3] Port tests to modern C

2023-02-03 Thread Jim Meyering
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 10:19 PM Frederic Berat wrote: > From: Frédéric Bérat > Hello, > > There is ongoing work from both GCC and Clang community to set the C99 > standard > as the default one. > In this context, Fedora packages were rebuilt with some warnings turned as > errors to simulate the

[bug#59991] [PATCH v2 0/3] Port tests to modern C

2022-12-15 Thread Frederic Berat
From: Frédéric Bérat Hello, There is ongoing work from both GCC and Clang community to set the C99 standard as the default one. In this context, Fedora packages were rebuilt with some warnings turned as errors to simulate the change. This leads to failures in Automake, that are attempted to be f