Hi Stefano,
Den 2010-08-06 13:54 skrev Stefano Lattarini:
At Friday 06 August 2010, Peter Rosin wrote:
[CUT]
I did get a spurious failure in cond5.test, but it went away when
I ran it separately.
Did you by chance run many tests in parallel? If yes, you might have hit
a known issue:
The
At Friday 06 August 2010, Peter Rosin wrote:
Hi Stefano,
Den 2010-08-06 13:54 skrev Stefano Lattarini:
At Friday 06 August 2010, Peter Rosin wrote:
[CUT]
I was not running in parallel and I was running off of the msvc
branch (basically maint I think) plus the commit in the previous
Den 2010-08-06 15:56 skrev Peter Rosin:
kill success:
=== Running test ./tmp.test
++ pwd
/home/peda/automake/git/automake/tests/tmp.dir
+ set -e
+ cat
+ cat
+ sh -c 'echo %aclocal pid: $$; sleep 2'
%aclocal pid: 12228
+ pid=13504
+ sh -c 'echo %automake pid: $$; sleep 4; echo variable OPT_SRC
Den 2010-08-06 15:15 skrev Stefano Lattarini:
To help us pinpoint the problem, could you please try to run the
attached fake test scripts multiple times, and post the outputs?
Please forgive me the for the ugliness of such scripts, but I'm just
taking wild guesses here.
For tmp.test, I swapped
Peter, thanks for your analysis. So it seems a bug in the kill
builtin of the MSYS shell after all, just like you suggested.
At Friday 06 August 2010, Peter Rosin wrote:
[CUT]
tmp3.test always works, but takes different branches depending
on if kill worked or not.
kill failure:
===
Den 2010-08-06 15:15 skrev Stefano Lattarini:
At Friday 06 August 2010, Peter Rosin wrote:
Hi Stefano,
Den 2010-08-06 13:54 skrev Stefano Lattarini:
At Friday 06 August 2010, Peter Rosin wrote:
[CUT]
I was not running in parallel and I was running off of the msvc
branch (basically maint I
Hi Peter. It seems our patches crossed...
At Friday 06 August 2010, Peter Rosin wrote:
As seen above, kill seems to always work once it starts to work,
so I tried to insert a sleep before the first kill. That fixes
it. I have 10+ consecutive successes, no fails.
Please apply this on top of
* Peter Rosin wrote on Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 04:11:20PM CEST:
Please apply this on top of maint:
Thanks, done. You can make us even happier if you submit patches with
git format-patch $ref
where $ref is the starting point you're basing on. I don't care whether
you attach the files or send
At Friday 06 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Peter Rosin wrote on Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 04:11:20PM CEST:
Please apply this on top of maint:
Thanks, done. You can make us even happier if you submit patches
with git format-patch $ref
where $ref is the starting point you're basing on.
Hi Stefano,
Den 2010-08-06 20:52 skrev Stefano Lattarini:
At Friday 06 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Stefano, sorry for not taking your patch; I saw Peter's earlier and
had good success testing it on MinGW; also, I think it is easier
to understand than yours. Hope you don't mind.
At Friday 06 August 2010, Peter Rosin wrote:
Hi Stefano,
FWIW, your patch worked 10+ times in a row for me, and no fails.
I personally don't care which patch eventually makes it...
It seems it has been your one ;-). No big deal for me, either, and
thanks for the testing.
Regards,
11 matches
Mail list logo
