[ http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2006-10/msg00067.html ]
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 08:07:09PM CEST:
> * Stepan Kasal wrote on Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 12:02:05PM CEST:
> >
> > I think that the patch has broken the error message in the
> > procedure. Attached
Hello Stepan,
* Stepan Kasal wrote on Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 12:02:05PM CEST:
>
> I think that the patch has broken the error message in the
> procedure. Attached is a proposed patch.
Thanks. With the typo in your patch fixed, and testsuite exposure
added as below, OK for HEAD and branch-1-10?
Hello Ralf,
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 07:12:53PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues applied:
> > RW> * automake.in (handle_LIBOBJS_or_ALLOCA): If we are in the
> > RW> LIBOBJDIR, then we should not add a DEPDIR prefix.
> > RW> * tests/pr401.test: Update test.
> > RW> * tests/pr401b.test: Likewise.
> > RW>
* Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 04:22:47PM CEST:
> >>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> RW> OK to apply?
>
> Sure. Thanks.
Done, thanks.
> RW> * automake.in (handle_LIBOBJS_or_ALLOCA): If we are in the
> RW> LIBOBJDIR, then we should not add a DEPDI
>>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
RW> OK to apply?
Sure. Thanks.
RW> 2006-10-09 Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
RW> * automake.in (handle_LIBOBJS_or_ALLOCA): If we are in the
RW> LIBOBJDIR, then we should not add a DEPDIR prefix.
RW> * tests/pr401.test:
[ http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-automake/2006-10/msg1.html ]
* Jim Meyering wrote on Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 06:06:25PM CEST:
> [cc'ing bug-automake, in case this is a bug.
> I was using both automake-1.9b and the latest from cvs. ]
OK to apply?
2006-10-09 Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PRO
