The next Automake version (1.10) will make use of Autoconf-2.60's macro
AC_PROG_MKDIR_P in the macro AM_PROG_MKDIR_P, thus `$(mkdir_p)' may be
expressed in terms of `$(MKDIR_P)'. Since gettext's Makefile.in.in (and
thus packages that use gettext) in general rely on the definition
provided by AM_PR
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> The next Automake version (1.10) will make use of Autoconf-2.60's macro
> AC_PROG_MKDIR_P in the macro AM_PROG_MKDIR_P, thus `$(mkdir_p)' may be
> expressed in terms of `$(MKDIR_P)'.
> ...
> gettext-runtime/po:
> 2006-08-16 Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
* Bruno Haible wrote on Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 09:24:25PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > The next Automake version (1.10) will make use of Autoconf-2.60's macro
> > AC_PROG_MKDIR_P in the macro AM_PROG_MKDIR_P, thus `$(mkdir_p)' may be
> > expressed in terms of `$(MKDIR_P)'.
> Thanks, I applied
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> gettext-runtime/intl:
> * Makefile.in: (MKDIR_P): New variable. Needed by $(mkdir_p)
> with Automake-1.10.
Thanks, applied.
> (I'm trying to get to know gettext a bit; so far its number of
> directories and configure scripts seems daunting to me...)
If you f
>>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
RW> Another possibility would be to back out the relevant
RW> change of AM_PROG_MKDIR_P for Automake-1.10;
I've installed this simple change in Automake.
--- m4/mkdirp.m419 Aug 2006 13:58:03 - 1.12
Alexandre Duret-Lutz writes:
"RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RW> Another possibility would be to back out the relevant
RW> change of AM_PROG_MKDIR_P for Automake-1.10;
I've installed this simple change in Automake.
By which you have re-introduced a bug we fixed before
D'oh! Sorry. After digging the Autoconf sources (shouldn't
the manual document that @MKDIR_P@ is magic?) I now understand
why my patch was bogus. But I'm not satisfied by the previous
state either. I don't want to causes too much "dominos upgrades"
(where you run Automake 1.10 on your package
[ removing bug-gnu-gettext, adding autotonf-patches; this is
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2006-08/msg00041.html ]
Hello Alexandre, all,
* Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 04:28:30PM CEST:
> D'oh! Sorry. After digging the Autoconf sources (shouldn't
> the
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is neither documented nor is it a desirable situation:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf-patches/2006-05/msg00052.html
> but it ended up being part of Autoconf for simplicity of the code (or
> maybe just by chance?):
> http://lists.gnu.
>>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
RW> While I understand this, I do think your change is unfortunate:
RW> First, it require Autoconf to always use `mkdir' with an absolute
RW> directory. This is neither documented nor is it a desirable situation:
RW> http://lists.
10 matches
Mail list logo
