Hi Ralf. As you asked, I report here what would be, in my opinion,
the preferred order of review for the still-pending patches of mine.
I also add some details on the patches, where I think that might help.
1. [PATCH] "Work around a bug in Solaris make's file-inclusion
At Tuesday 20 April 2010, Ralf Wildenhues
wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> > In fact, I'm assuming that you haven't
> > answered the the recent still-pending patches' proposals
> > basically for lack of time;
>
> Right. Those where I've merged y
at you're talking about overlooked typos/mistakes, not
> "overlooked" patches, right?
Right.
> In fact, I'm assuming that you haven't
> answered the the recent still-pending patches' proposals basically for
> lack of time;
Right. Those where I've merged y
Hi Alexandre, all,
* Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 08:49:07AM CEST:
>
> Ralf, please go ahead and apply the patches you deem appropriate.
Thank you. I'm starting off with some easy ones and work my way through
the last two "pending patches" lists, w
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 11:23:03PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hello Alexandre,
>
> I know you have little or no time for Automake currently. Would you
> please speak up if you have any issue with me applying/approving some
> of the patches that have been pending for a long while long now (e.g
Hello Alexandre,
I know you have little or no time for Automake currently. Would you
please speak up if you have any issue with me applying/approving some
of the patches that have been pending for a long while long now (e.g.,
patches by Eric, Paolo, Bernd, Charles, some of mine)? To make things
s
Patches not reviewed last time:
> addressing the "deleted .m4 file" problem:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2006-09/msg00028.html
> distdir-clean/distcheck-clean addition:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2006-09/msg00021.html
New patches (probably incom
Hello Alexandre,
* Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 04:58:39PM CEST:
>
> Given that people are waiting for 1.10, I'd like to postpone all
> these changes to after the release, and aim for 1.11 shortly afterward.
> (Maybe skipping 1.10.1 depending on feedback.)
Yes. Sigh. If t
>>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Given that people are waiting for 1.10, I'd like to postpone all
these changes to after the release, and aim for 1.11 shortly afterward.
(Maybe skipping 1.10.1 depending on feedback.)
RW> addressing the "deleted .m4 file" problem:
RW> http
Salut Alexandre, all,
For your convenience, I have compiled a list of pending patches against
Automake again, very roughly in what I regard decreasing priority, and
without guarantee of completeness (I've tried):
support cross multilibs (Geoffrey Keating):
http://lists.gnu.org/archive
10 matches
Mail list logo
