Reference:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2010-11/msg00162.html
[For the sake of the reading this message in real-time: this reply
has been sent pratically without changes also to the related thread
Testsuite failures on IRIX 6.5]
FAIL: distlinksbrk.test (exit: 1)
Reference:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2010-11/msg00166.html
[For the sake of the reading this message in real-time: this reply
has been sent pratically without changes also to the related thread
Testsuite failures on HP-UX 11.23]
FAIL: distlinksbrk.test (exit: 1)
Ping on this? Reference:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2010-11/msg00211.html
Regards,
Stefano
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 20:45 UTC, Ralf Wildenhues
ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:05:55PM CET:
http://autobuild.josefsson.org/automake/log-201011141903417895000.txt
checking build system type... sparc-sun-solaris2.10
All the testsuite
In the meantime, I've prepared a patch to fix the VPATH-related
spurious failures in parallel-tests8.test and suffix13.test.
Ralf, does it work for you?
Regards,
Stefano
From 87e825fb00f90939b58cc9dd4eddc4a2cb9d5d0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefano Lattarini stefano.lattar...@gmail.com
Hello Stefano,
I think it is time to reevaluate some of the work that has been done in
the last few weeks. I'd like to ask you to postpone pushes of pending
stuff that has a clock ticking, and look at the lots of new failures
that a testsuite run shows on a few hosts; you can find them in some
On Sunday 14 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Stefano,
I think it is time to reevaluate some of the work that has been done in
the last few weeks. I'd like to ask you to postpone pushes of pending
stuff that has a clock ticking, and look at the lots of new failures
that a
On Sunday 14 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Stefano,
I think it is time to reevaluate some of the work that has been done in
the last few weeks. I'd like to ask you to postpone pushes of pending
stuff that has a clock ticking, and look at the lots of new failures
that a
[Reposting with a better subject. Sorry for the noise.]
On Sunday 14 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Stefano,
I think it is time to reevaluate some of the work that has been done in
the last few weeks. I'd like to ask you to postpone pushes of pending
stuff that has a clock
Please disregard; answer to the message
Testsuite failures on Solaris 2.10 on SPARC
instead.
Sorry for the noise,
Stefano
On Sunday 14 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Stefano,
I think it is time to reevaluate some of the work that has been done in
the last few weeks.
Do you mean go and fix the newly introduced regressions before doing
other testsuite work, or reconsider the advisability of doing
On Sunday 14 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Stefano,
I think it is time to reevaluate some of the work that has been done in
the last few weeks. I'd like to ask you to postpone pushes of pending
stuff that has a clock ticking, and look at the lots of new failures
that a
On Sunday 14 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Stefano,
I think it is time to reevaluate some of the work that has been done in
the last few weeks. I'd like to ask you to postpone pushes of pending
stuff that has a clock ticking, and look at the lots of new failures
that a
On Sunday 14 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Stefano,
I think it is time to reevaluate some of the work that has been done in
the last few weeks. I'd like to ask you to postpone pushes of pending
stuff that has a clock ticking, and look at the lots of new failures
that a
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:19:00AM CET:
On Sunday 14 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
I think it is time to reevaluate some of the work that has been done in
the last few weeks.
Do you mean go and fix the newly introduced regressions before doing
other
15 matches
Mail list logo
