Re: [Avocado-devel] RFC: avocado.utils.process (or, how to handle the split stdout/stderr recording)

2017-11-13 Thread Satheesh Rajendran
On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 10:01 -0500, Cleber Rosa wrote: > > play.  Both "stdout", "stderr" and "none" are aptly named.  But, with > the introduction of a third *real* output record option/file, "all" > becomes a rather bad option name. > > To keep things simple, I'd add an alias from "all" to "both

Re: [Avocado-devel] RFC: avocado.utils.process (or, how to handle the split stdout/stderr recording)

2017-11-09 Thread Amador Pahim
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Cleber Rosa wrote: > > > On 11/09/2017 03:38 AM, Amador Pahim wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Cleber Rosa wrote: >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> This is kind of brainstorm about the really annoying issue we've trying >>> to deal with in Avocado. The root probl

Re: [Avocado-devel] RFC: avocado.utils.process (or, how to handle the split stdout/stderr recording)

2017-11-09 Thread Jeff Nelson
On Wed, 8 Nov 2017 10:01:22 -0500 Cleber Rosa wrote: > Hi everyone, > > This is kind of brainstorm about the really annoying issue we've trying > to deal with in Avocado. The root problem we're trying to fix is that > Avocado's "output check" feature can not be used when the test's > generated

Re: [Avocado-devel] RFC: avocado.utils.process (or, how to handle the split stdout/stderr recording)

2017-11-09 Thread Cleber Rosa
On 11/09/2017 03:38 AM, Amador Pahim wrote: > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Cleber Rosa wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> This is kind of brainstorm about the really annoying issue we've trying >> to deal with in Avocado. The root problem we're trying to fix is that >> Avocado's "output check" fea

Re: [Avocado-devel] RFC: avocado.utils.process (or, how to handle the split stdout/stderr recording)

2017-11-09 Thread Amador Pahim
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Cleber Rosa wrote: > Hi everyone, > > This is kind of brainstorm about the really annoying issue we've trying > to deal with in Avocado. The root problem we're trying to fix is that > Avocado's "output check" feature can not be used when the test's > generated cont

Re: [Avocado-devel] RFC: avocado.utils.process (or, how to handle the split stdout/stderr recording)

2017-11-08 Thread Cleber Rosa
On 11/08/2017 11:01 AM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote: > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Cleber Rosa wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> This is kind of brainstorm about the really annoying issue we've trying >> to deal with in Avocado. The root problem we're trying to fix is that >> Avocado's "outpu

Re: [Avocado-devel] RFC: avocado.utils.process (or, how to handle the split stdout/stderr recording)

2017-11-08 Thread Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Cleber Rosa wrote: > Hi everyone, > > This is kind of brainstorm about the really annoying issue we've trying > to deal with in Avocado. The root problem we're trying to fix is that > Avocado's "output check" feature can not be used when the test's > generated cont

[Avocado-devel] RFC: avocado.utils.process (or, how to handle the split stdout/stderr recording)

2017-11-08 Thread Cleber Rosa
Hi everyone, This is kind of brainstorm about the really annoying issue we've trying to deal with in Avocado. The root problem we're trying to fix is that Avocado's "output check" feature can not be used when the test's generated content combines both stdout and stderr in a single file. One exam