Re: [Avocado-devel] Request to backport PR 1376 to 36lts

2017-09-11 Thread Cleber Rosa
On 09/11/2017 10:21 AM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:23 AM Lukáš Doktor > wrote: > > Hello Guannan, > > theoretically we should not accept such backport, because it's a new > feature, not a

Re: [Avocado-devel] Request to backport PR 1376 to 36lts

2017-09-11 Thread Lukáš Doktor
Hello Guannan, theoretically we should not accept such backport, because it's a new feature, not a bugfix. Anyway it touches `avocado.utils` and it's not changing existing callbacks. What do you think, guys? In my view the `avocado/core` is the core and I wouldn't like such changes there, but

Re: [Avocado-devel] Request to backport PR 1376 to 36lts

2017-09-08 Thread Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 1:04 PM Amador Pahim wrote: > On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues > wrote: > > Hi Guannan, > > > > Since 52.0 is the new LTS release, and since we usually only backport > > bugfixes, not features, I'd ask you if

Re: [Avocado-devel] Request to backport PR 1376 to 36lts

2017-09-08 Thread Amador Pahim
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote: > Hi Guannan, > > Since 52.0 is the new LTS release, and since we usually only backport > bugfixes, not features, I'd ask you if porting your stuff to 52.0 is an > option. > > Because the request, as is, is

Re: [Avocado-devel] Request to backport PR 1376 to 36lts

2017-09-08 Thread Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
Hi Guannan, Since 52.0 is the new LTS release, and since we usually only backport bugfixes, not features, I'd ask you if porting your stuff to 52.0 is an option. Because the request, as is, is something that I [1] would like to avoid. Please let me know of your current needs and let's see how we