Re: [avr-gcc-list] cbr and negative numbers

2008-09-12 Thread Ruud Vlaming
On Friday 12 September 2008 21:53, Pink Boy wrote: > As an aside, Freertos was just getting underway when I started > using AVRX, but is now much more widely supported and mature now. FreeRTOS is very good, and i ported it (for own use) to the ATtiny861. It runs perfectly, but is to large for an

RE: [avr-gcc-list] cbr and negative numbers

2008-09-12 Thread Pink Boy
Stu Bell sez, > > There's an OS for the AVR? Whoa. I had no idea. >> Guess I know what website I'll be perusing this morning. > > > > Is it stable yet? > > Check the Tutorials forum on avrfreaks.net -- there's a > thread with a pile of Oses for AVRs of all flavors. I've used AVRX and it's certa

Re: [avr-gcc-list] cbr and negative numbers

2008-09-12 Thread Ruud Vlaming
On Friday 12 September 2008 20:17, Stu Bell wrote: > > Is it stable yet? > > Check the Tutorials forum on avrfreaks.net -- there's a thread with a > pile of Oses for AVRs of all flavors. Hmm, i had better called mine YAVTROS - Compact form for: Yet Another AVR Real Time OS ;-) But i didn't, beca

RE: [avr-gcc-list] cbr and negative numbers

2008-09-12 Thread Stu Bell
> > So have a look at my OS for the AVR, sources included (GPLv3) > > http://www.femtoos.org/ > > ;-) > > There's an OS for the AVR? Whoa. I had no idea. Guess I know what website I'll be perusing this morning. > > Is it stable yet? Check the Tutorials forum on avrfreaks.net -- there's a thread

RE: [avr-gcc-list] cbr and negative numbers

2008-09-12 Thread Weddington, Eric
> -Original Message- > From: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > org] On Behalf Of Gre7g Luterman > Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 9:19 AM > To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org > Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] cbr and negative numbers > > - Original Message > From: Ruud

Re: [avr-gcc-list] cbr and negative numbers

2008-09-12 Thread Ruud Vlaming
On Friday 12 September 2008 17:19, Gre7g Luterman wrote: > > So have a look at my OS for the AVR, sources included (GPLv3) > > http://www.femtoos.org/ > > ;-) > > There's an OS for the AVR? It is for the AVR but at this moment there is only one port, for the ATtiny861,461,261 The OS is complete

RE: [avr-gcc-list] cbr and negative numbers

2008-09-12 Thread Larry Barello
AvrX has been around since the late 90's www.barello.net/Avrx www.yahoogroups.com/group/avrx I originally wrote it for the at90S2313 with 128 bytes of stack. Later I modified it for larger chips (16 bit stack). It is almost entirely in assembly. There is no active development or maintenance

Re: [avr-gcc-list] cbr and negative numbers

2008-09-12 Thread Gre7g Luterman
- Original Message From: Ruud Vlaming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 8:23:23 AM Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] cbr and negative numbers > So have a look at my OS for the AVR, sources included (GPLv3) > http://www.femtoos.org/ > ;-) There's a

Re: [avr-gcc-list] cbr and negative numbers

2008-09-12 Thread Ruud Vlaming
On Thursday 11 September 2008 22:55, Joerg Wunsch wrote: > If you've got a patch that doesn't break anything else (in particular > in non-mint8 land), I think it has a real chance of being > incorporated. Otherwise, it will be tough. Of course, that goes without saying. Maybe i have a look afte

Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: cbr and negative numbers

2008-09-12 Thread Ruud Vlaming
On Thursday 11 September 2008 16:19, you wrote: > > Now i don't know of any instruction that takes an immediate 16 bit > operand, but still. > > CALL (takes 2-byte operand on most AVRs, 3-byte operand on avr6 > (m2560/1) > JMP  (takes 2-byte operand on most AVRs, 3-byte operand on avr6 > (m2560/1