Re: [avr-gcc-list] PICIE0/1 incorrect define in iom165a.h?

2013-08-13 Thread Jim Brain
On 8/13/2013 3:35 PM, Joerg Wunsch wrote: Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote: Thanks for the report. I've filed a bug in the avr-libc bug tracker (https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?39779) as well as our internal tracker. Nobody ever contributed the ATmega165A to the official avr-libc tree.

Re: [avr-gcc-list] PICIE0/1 incorrect define in iom165a.h?

2013-08-13 Thread Joerg Wunsch
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote: > Thanks for the report. I've filed a bug in the avr-libc bug tracker > (https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?39779) as well as our > internal tracker. Nobody ever contributed the ATmega165A to the official avr-libc tree. Thus I have to close the bug report a

Re: [avr-gcc-list] PICIE0/1 incorrect define in iom165a.h?

2013-08-13 Thread Joerg Wunsch
Jim Brain wrote: > I'm not sure what other issues there might be, but PCIE0 is bit 4 and > PCIE1 is bit 5 on 165a/pa, while it's 6 and 7 on 165 (and I think > 165p). So they are not binary compatible? Ouch. Sethil, thanks for the bug report. -- cheers, Joerg .-.-. --... ...-

Re: [avr-gcc-list] PICIE0/1 incorrect define in iom165a.h?

2013-08-13 Thread Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
> I assume it's a known item, but I thought I would mention it in case > anyone is having fits with PCINTs on the M165A line and using AVR > GCC > Thanks for the report. I've filed a bug in the avr-libc bug tracker (https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?39779) as well as our internal tracker