Gabriel Dos Reis schrieb:
Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Gabriel Dos Reis schrieb:
Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
I guess I would need to get my feet wet with
1. minimal free-standing C++ implementations without exceptions
2. get support for RTTI (without exceptions)
3. exception
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Sergey A. Borshch
wrote:
> On 05/03/2012 05:20 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>>
>> and flash if we decide to have one.
>
> And to have great incompatibility with C11 address space qualifiers.
See how C11 handles std::atomic.
Anyway, all I am conveying is that if th
On 05/03/2012 05:20 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
and flash if we decide to have one.
And to have great incompatibility with C11 address space qualifiers.
Sergey.
___
AVR-GCC-list mailing list
AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 9:01 AM, David Brown wrote:
>>> I think this is okay for C++, too?
>>
>>
>> In C++, you can also access a non-const object with
>> a const qualified pointer. But, that is not what I was
>> suggesting. I am suggesting that a const(expr) *object* should
>> go in program mem
On 03/05/2012 15:29, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:33 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Gabriel Dos Reis schrieb:
Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
I guess I would need to get my feet wet with
1. minimal free-standing C++ implementations without exceptions
2.
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:33 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> Gabriel Dos Reis schrieb:
>>
>> Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>>
>>> Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
I guess I would need to get my feet wet with
1. minimal free-standing C++ implementations without exceptions
2. get support for
Gabriel Dos Reis schrieb:
Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
I guess I would need to get my feet wet with
1. minimal free-standing C++ implementations without exceptions
2. get support for RTTI (without exceptions)
3. exceptions (assuming 1 and 2 are done successfully)
Regarding
On 02/05/2012 18:16, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:18 AM, David Brown wrote:
I agree with what you are saying. I'm just trying to suggest that getting
Haskell to work on the AVR is more akin to getting Linux to work on the AVR
- while perhaps Lua, OCAML, more C++, or other
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:18 AM, David Brown wrote:
> I agree with what you are saying. I'm just trying to suggest that getting
> Haskell to work on the AVR is more akin to getting Linux to work on the AVR
> - while perhaps Lua, OCAML, more C++, or other options might be a better
> balance.
the
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Weddington, Eric
wrote:
> We're talking about university students and research projects. It does NOT
> have to be efficient. They're working on something new. It's the nature of
> research projects to try and find out what are the issues. Maybe they'll
> discov
> - Could Lua be made to work on an AVR?
eLua already runs on the AVR32:
http://www.eluaproject.net/overview/status
Only real problem with Lua on the AVR that I recall is lack of RAM,
when I looked at doing this a few years ago.
Some type of post processing of the code might be able to get more
: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re:
[avr-gcc-list] using exceptions
I can't help wondering in all this - is it worth the effort? Are
people /really/ going to program in Haskell for the AVR? Don't get
me wrong here - I like functional programming, and would prefer to
be able to do more
@nongnu.org
> Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] using exceptions
>
>
> I can't help wondering in all this - is it worth the effort? Are people
> /really/ going to program in Haskell for the AVR? Don't get me wrong
> here - I like functional programming, and would prefer to
On 01/05/2012 17:18, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
My recent interests in AVR grew out of educational and research
activities -- as I explained in a relatively recent post on libstdc++. I am
still learning AVR and its toolsets but I can definitely help with the C++ part.
We are in the situation where
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
My recent interests in AVR grew out of educational and research
activities -- as I explained in a relatively recent post on libstdc++.
I am still learning AVR and its toolsets but I can definitely
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>>>
>>> My recent interests in AVR grew out of educational and research
>>> activities -- as I explained in a relatively recent post on libstdc++.
>>> I am still learning AVR and its toolsets but I can definitely help with
>>> the C++ part.
>>>
>>> We are in the situation
> Not having libstdc++ for the AVR has not had big consequences; the only
> complaints that we've ever had was for not having the new and delete
> operators.
I know your aware of this Eric as you commented on it back in 2006,
but for any new comers that might want to became the new/delete
mainta
On 01/05/2012 15:04, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Gabriel Dos Reis schrieb:
Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Kövesdi György schrieb:
I am using avr-g++ for building my projects for avr and i am
happy with it. :-)
But i would need exception support, and could not find how to
get it work. I found some mails
On 01/05/2012 21:34, Bob Paddock wrote:
a subgroup
of students (under my direction) has set up to write a
compiler for a subset
of Haskell targetting AVR. This is quite an exciting research project.
There is the Atom subset of Haskell meant for embedding, if you are
not aware o
Hi,
this thread got hijacked anyway, so here are just my 2 cents ;)
C++ on the AVR has had more attention recently, mainly because of the
Arduino community. The Arduino language is translated into C++ and then
indeed, it's so much fun to play with that instead of writing the same
boring stuf
Tuesday, May 01, 2012 2:06 PM
>> To: Bob Paddock; Gabriel Dos Reis
>> Cc: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
>> Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] using exceptions
>>
>>
>>
>> > There is the Atom subset of Haskell meant for embedding, if you are
>> > not aware of
Lay; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org; Joerg Wunsch
>> Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] using exceptions
>>
>>
>> Essentially, we would like to:
>> (1) "spice up" our programming class projects with
>> robots programming -- many of our students are native C++
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Bob Paddock wrote:
>> a subgroup
>> of students (under my direction) has set up to write a
>> compiler for a subset
>> of Haskell targetting AVR. This is quite an exciting research
>> project.
>
> There is the Atom subset of Haskell meant for embeddi
> -Original Message-
> From: dosr...@gmail.com [mailto:dosr...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Gabriel Dos
> Reis
> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 11:48 AM
> To: Weddington, Eric
> Cc: Georg-Johann Lay; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org; Joerg Wunsch
> Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-l
> Cc: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
> Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] using exceptions
>
>
>
> > There is the Atom subset of Haskell meant for embedding, if you are
> > not aware of it:
> >
> > "Atom is a Haskell DSL for designing hard real-time embedded software.
&g
gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] using exceptions
>
> > a subgroup
> > of students (under my direction) has set up to write a
> > compiler for a subset
> > of Haskell targetting AVR. This is quite an exciting research
> project.
>
> The
> -Original Message-
> From: dosr...@gmail.com [mailto:dosr...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Gabriel Dos
> Reis
> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 11:48 AM
> To: Weddington, Eric
> Cc: Georg-Johann Lay; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org; Joerg Wunsch
> Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-l
> a subgroup
> of students (under my direction) has set up to write a
> compiler for a subset
> of Haskell targetting AVR. This is quite an exciting research project.
There is the Atom subset of Haskell meant for embedding, if you are
not aware of it:
"Atom is a Haskell DSL for des
> Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>I guess I would need to get my feet wet with
> 1. minimal free-standing C++ implementations without exceptions
As for getting started, you'll find much of the collected knowledge
about using C++ on AVRs in the AVR Freaks thread below.
http://www.avrfreaks.net/index.php
Tuesday, May 01, 2012 9:18 AM
>> To: Georg-Johann Lay
>> Cc: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
>> Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] using exceptions
>>
>>
>> My recent interests in AVR grew out of educational and research
>> activities -- as I explained in a relatively rece
r-gcc-list@nongnu.org
> Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] using exceptions
>
>
> My recent interests in AVR grew out of educational and research
> activities -- as I explained in a relatively recent post on libstdc++. I am
> still learning AVR and its toolsets but I can definitely help
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> Gabriel Dos Reis schrieb:
>>
>> Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>>>
>>> Kövesdi György schrieb:
>>>
I am using avr-g++ for building my projects for avr and i am
happy with it. :-)
But i would need exception support, and could not fin
Gabriel Dos Reis schrieb:
Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Kövesdi György schrieb:
I am using avr-g++ for building my projects for avr and i am
happy with it. :-)
But i would need exception support, and could not find how to
get it work. I found some mails in the archive (dated many
years ago) about po
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> Kövesdi György schrieb:
>
>
>> I am using avr-g++ for building my projects for avr and i am happy with
>> it. :-)
>> But i would need exception support, and could not find how to get it work.
>> :-(
>> I found some mails in the archive (da
Kövesdi György schrieb:
I am using avr-g++ for building my projects for avr and i am happy with it. :-)
But i would need exception support, and could not find how to get it work. :-(
I found some mails in the archive (dated many years ago) about possibility of
building libstdc++ or libsupc++ wit
Hi,
I am using avr-g++ for building my projects for avr and i am happy with it. :-)
But i would need exception support, and could not find how to get it work. :-(
I found some mails in the archive (dated many years ago) about possibility of
building libstdc++ or libsupc++ with exception support, b
36 matches
Mail list logo
