[avr-libc-dev] [bug #37848] Add arrays to some Xmega peripheral structures

2012-11-30 Thread Erik Walthinsen
URL: Summary: Add arrays to some Xmega peripheral structures Project: AVR C Runtime Library Submitted by: omega Submitted on: Fri 30 Nov 2012 05:37:33 PM PST Category: Feature Reque

Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?

2012-11-30 Thread Erik Walthinsen
On 11/30/2012 03:33 PM, Weddington, Eric wrote: To be clear, I was referring to the header files that *Atmel* has generated from their own XML files. It's those header files that can't be submitted by anyone outside Atmel. Right. So, there seem to be two choices: let Atmel (you?) submit the

[avr-libc-dev] [bug #37847] Xmega power.h groupings are wrong

2012-11-30 Thread Erik Walthinsen
Additional Item Attachment, bug #37847 (project avr-libc): File name: power.hSize:11 KB ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Messa

[avr-libc-dev] [bug #37847] Xmega power.h groupings are wrong

2012-11-30 Thread Erik Walthinsen
URL: Summary: Xmega power.h groupings are wrong Project: AVR C Runtime Library Submitted by: omega Submitted on: Fri 30 Nov 2012 04:34:10 PM PST Category: Header Sev

Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?

2012-11-30 Thread Weddington, Eric
> -Original Message- > From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org > [mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On > Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch > Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 4:18 PM > To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org > Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8

Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?

2012-11-30 Thread Joerg Wunsch
As Weddington, Eric wrote: (XML) > That is dodgy; Atmel owns the copyright on those files. It's not > within your right to submit a work that you don't own the copyright > on. Well, back in the era when Ted Roth did most of the work here, the statement he got from Atmel was that using (or copyin

Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?

2012-11-30 Thread Weddington, Eric
> -Original Message- > From: Erik Walthinsen [mailto:om...@omegacs.net] > Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 3:40 PM > To: Weddington, Eric > Cc: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org > Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1? > > I thought I read a while back that since the headers are strictly > derived (by

Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?

2012-11-30 Thread Erik Walthinsen
On 11/30/2012 11:04 AM, Weddington, Eric wrote: The header files go into avr-libc, which just has the BSD license. All we require of submitters, is that they license their work with the same license (for consistency purposes). You would retain the copyright. I thought I read a while back that s

[avr-libc-dev] [bug #36350] FUSE4_DEFAULT wrong for Xmega A devices

2012-11-30 Thread anonymous
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #36350 (project avr-libc): While you're at it, It seems to me that FUSE1_DEFAULT is also incorrect. in iox128a1.h, it is defined as 0xFF However, the xmega manual describes it to be 0x00. Unfortunately I don't have hardware to verify this. ___

Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?

2012-11-30 Thread Weddington, Eric
> -Original Message- > From: Erik Walthinsen [mailto:om...@omegacs.net] > Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:49 AM > To: Weddington, Eric > Cc: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org > Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1? > > On 11/29/2012 02:55 PM, Weddington, Eric wrote: > > Well, go ahead and post the

Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?

2012-11-30 Thread Erik Walthinsen
On 11/29/2012 02:55 PM, Weddington, Eric wrote: Well, go ahead and post the patches then. :-) Let's get you up and going... Ironically I think I have all the *codebase* changes in place, but am having problems figuring out how to convert the XML files into headers Is that something I sho

Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?

2012-11-30 Thread Erik Walthinsen
On 11/30/2012 08:49 AM, Weddington, Eric wrote: Cool! Do you have any public links to your talk? I know that ARM GCC has a similar switch. II

Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?

2012-11-30 Thread Weddington, Eric
> -Original Message- > From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org > [mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On > Behalf Of Erik Walthinsen > Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 9:38 AM > To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org > Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.

Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?

2012-11-30 Thread Erik Walthinsen
On 11/29/2012 11:20 PM, Joerg Wunsch wrote: Still, if it's not the IDE that does it on their behalf, most of those professional ARM developers are hosed. They solely rely on their (often payware, like CodeSourcery) IDE to do it for them. If the IDE doesn't do it, they are standing in about the

Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?

2012-11-30 Thread Georg-Johann Lay
Weddington, Eric schrieb: Hi Johann, I'm understand your rant, but from my experience, I can't share in it. More comments inline below. Sorry to say that, but supporting each device in the compiler / binutils is bit of --censored--. Y'know it's been this way for over 10 years. And other AVR