Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?

2012-12-03 Thread Georg-Johann Lay
Joerg Wunsch schrieb: The problem with supporting new devices is, without a corresponding addition to binutils and GCC, it could not even be compile-tested in avr-libc. If it's really the case that avr-libc waits for avr-gcc -mmmcu=device and the compiler waits until avr-libc supports Device,

Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?

2012-12-03 Thread Joerg Wunsch
As Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > If you use 4.7 with 1.8.0 you'll get a broken toolchain, for example > some linux distros or MHV AVR tools 4.7.2. Just in order to demonstrate the breakage caused by this, do you perchance have a small example that shows the problem? That way, I could make sure it's

Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?

2012-12-03 Thread Georg-Johann Lay
Joerg Wunsch schrieb: As Georg-Johann Lay wrote: #35407 Missing multilib versions for tiny-stack targets I agree that we should at least have a glance at the bugs and patches before rolling a new release. One problem is that there is currently no AVR Libc version that can be used with avr