Re: [avr-libc-dev] New eeprom library. Comments please

2005-07-25 Thread Björn Haase
Nigel Winterbottom wrote on Donnerstag, 21. Juli 2005 17:41 : > Hello All, > > I am aware of 3 problems with the eeprom support in avr-libc. > > 1. The SFR addresses are wrong for mega48, mega169, mega329 and the like. > 2. eeprom_write_block takes a very long time even for small blocks. > (56-Byte

RE: [avr-libc-dev] New eeprom library. Comments please

2005-07-25 Thread Nigel Winterbottom
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dmitry K. Sent: 24 July 2005 03:17 To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] New eeprom library. Comments please On Friday 22 July 2005 18:38, Nigel Winterbottom wrote: > The Attachment

Re: [avr-libc-dev] New eeprom library. Comments please

2005-07-23 Thread Dmitry K.
On Friday 22 July 2005 18:38, Nigel Winterbottom wrote: > The Attachment was missing (me being a buffoon). Now Added. ... Thanks, the code is good optimized. Notes: You use short commands (rcall/rjmp). Very well, but it is necessary to use subsections in this case (look, for example, libm or

Re: [avr-libc-dev] New eeprom library. Comments please

2005-07-22 Thread Joerg Wunsch
As Nigel Winterbottom wrote: > The Attachment was missing (me being a buffoon). Now Added. OK, I had a look at it. At first, please let me thank you for your effort and time spent into it. I'm definately interested. Anyway, as already mentioned, I'd much prefer a diff -u output (like "cvs diff

[avr-libc-dev] New eeprom library. Comments please

2005-07-21 Thread Nigel Winterbottom
Hello All, I am aware of 3 problems with the eeprom support in avr-libc. 1. The SFR addresses are wrong for mega48, mega169, mega329 and the like. 2. eeprom_write_block takes a very long time even for small blocks. (56-Bytes takes approx 0.5s) 3. A topic on AvrFreaks http://www.avrfreaks.com