Re: [avr-libc-dev] Suggested ISR function

2005-09-09 Thread Björn Haase
James A.R. Koehler wrote on Donnerstag, 8. September 2005 18:19 : > I'd vote for depreciating both SIGNAL and INTERRUPT in favour of ISR. > Indeed, I'd go further and suggest that it intrinsically be the given > the attribute of '__naked__' as, for the life of me, I can't see why it > is usef

Re: [avr-libc-dev] Suggested ISR function

2005-09-08 Thread Joerg Wunsch
As James A.R. Koehler wrote: > I'd vote for depreciating both SIGNAL and INTERRUPT in favour of > ISR. OK. > Indeed, I'd go further and suggest that it intrinsically be the > given the attribute of '__naked__' as, for the life of me, I can't > see why it is useful to have r0 and r1 set every tim

[avr-libc-dev] Suggested ISR function

2005-09-08 Thread James A.R. Koehler
I'd vote for depreciating both SIGNAL and INTERRUPT in favour of ISR. Indeed, I'd go further and suggest that it intrinsically be the given the attribute of '__naked__' as, for the life of me, I can't see why it is useful to have r0 and r1 set every time an interrupt occurs. Jim