I may have misunderstood the direction this thread had taken. I'm
still going through the spec.
--
Jeff
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Bruce Mitchener
wrote:
> What specific changes would you propose making to my proposal?
>
> - Bruce
>
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Jeff Hodges wrote:
What specific changes would you propose making to my proposal?
- Bruce
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Jeff Hodges wrote:
> Sorry for the spam. Python, java and apache httpd implementations
> listed at the project page: http://www.chromium.org/spdy
>
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Jeff
Sorry for the spam. Python, java and apache httpd implementations
listed at the project page: http://www.chromium.org/spdy
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Jeff Hodges wrote:
> Oh, and it's been partially implemented in Chromium, so there's a
> quasi-reference implementation.
> --
> Jeff
>
> On
Oh, and it's been partially implemented in Chromium, so there's a
quasi-reference implementation.
--
Jeff
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Jeff Hodges wrote:
> To throw another set of ideas into the hat, SPDY[1][2] would be good
> to learn from. SPDY takes the basics of HTTP and makes them fast.
To throw another set of ideas into the hat, SPDY[1][2] would be good
to learn from. SPDY takes the basics of HTTP and makes them fast.
Benefits we would enjoy include:
* Multiplexed streams
* Request prioritization
* HTTP header compression
* Server push
Currently in draft form.
[1] http://dev.c
