On 01/21/2012 06:08 PM, Perry Hargrave wrote:
Sony isn't releasing there (ps3) opengl wrapping code are they?
They only have to offer their modifications to the actual opengl libraries.
If you add a custom an unique piece of software, that uses a gpl product, you
are not required to gpl your cu
Perry Hargrave writes:
> On Jan 20, 2012 1:44 PM, "Julien Danjou" wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 20 2012, Perry Hargrave wrote:
>>
>> > But if they made custom modules that only use awful they don't have to
>> > make that available, right?
>>
>> Since awful is GPL, I *think* they would have to.
>>
>
>
On Jan 20, 2012 1:44 PM, "Julien Danjou" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 20 2012, Perry Hargrave wrote:
>
> > But if they made custom modules that only use awful they don't have to
> > make that available, right?
>
> Since awful is GPL, I *think* they would have to.
>
Sony isn't releasing there (ps3) ope
On 01/21/2012 01:58 PM, Uli Schlachter wrote:
You could find us a nice, small library for loading images into cairo surfaces.
Previously awesome was using imlib2 which has built-in support for loading a
wide variety of image formats.
However, the drawing API of imlib2 is IMHO quite limited and t
Hi,
On 21.01.2012 12:28, Alexander Yakushev wrote:
> The title says everything. As far as I can understand, the function
>
> capi.oocairo.image_surface_create_from_png(icon)
>
> which gets called in line 405 of the new naughty.lua is unfriendly to
> the JPEG files.
>
> My question is whet
The title says everything. As far as I can understand, the function
capi.oocairo.image_surface_create_from_png(icon)
which gets called in line 405 of the new naughty.lua is unfriendly to
the JPEG files.
My question is whether there is a way to display jpg images without
monkey patching t
Anurag Priyam wrote:
>On Jan 21, 2012 3:14 AM, "Julien Danjou" wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 20 2012, Perry Hargrave wrote:
>>
>> > But if they made custom modules that only use awful they don't have
>to
>> > make that available, right?
>>
>> Since awful is GPL, I *think* they would have to.
>
>Wri
On Jan 21, 2012 3:14 AM, "Julien Danjou" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 20 2012, Perry Hargrave wrote:
>
> > But if they made custom modules that only use awful they don't have to
> > make that available, right?
>
> Since awful is GPL, I *think* they would have to.
Write to FSF and ask them?
-- Anurag P
