On Fri, 19 Oct 2012, Bill Sun wrote:
> Are you going to update the 'vicious' lib so that it can cope with the
> next major release?
It is compatible with awesome 4, and with lua 5.2.
--
Adrian C. (anrxc) | anrxc..sysphere.org | PGP ID: D20A0618
PGP FP: 02A5 628A D8EE 2A93 996E 929F D5CB 31B7
Am Thu, 18 Oct 2012 08:09:03 +0800
schrieb Oon-Ee Ng :
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Adrian C. wrote:
> > On Sat, 13 Oct 2012, Adrian C. wrote:
> >
> >> I hope there will be enough of us so we can keep patching it for
> >> future xcb maybe even lua 5.2.
> >
> > To clarify, those devils from
Are you going to update the 'vicious' lib so that it can cope with the
next major release?
Regards.
--
To unsubscribe, send mail to awesome-unsubscr...@naquadah.org.
Don't worry about that, there will be a lua51 package, and the awesome
package from community will be updated. Maintainers of AUR packages
will have to do their job quickly but the main package should be fine.
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2012-September/023569.html
--
Ben
Hi,
On 19.10.2012 12:25, Adam Jimerson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Adrian C. wrote:
>>> On Sat, 13 Oct 2012, Adrian C. wrote:
>>>
I hope there will be enough of us so we can keep patching it for
future xcb may
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Adrian C. wrote:
> > On Sat, 13 Oct 2012, Adrian C. wrote:
> >
> >> I hope there will be enough of us so we can keep patching it for
> >> future xcb maybe even lua 5.2.
> >
> > To clarify, those devils
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Adrian C. wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Oct 2012, Adrian C. wrote:
>
>> I hope there will be enough of us so we can keep patching it for
>> future xcb maybe even lua 5.2.
>
> To clarify, those devils from Arch Linux will probably introduce it
> sooner than anyone.
We must b
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Adrian C. wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Oct 2012, Adrian C. wrote:
>
>> I hope there will be enough of us so we can keep patching it for
>> future xcb maybe even lua 5.2.
>
> To clarify, those devils from Arch Linux will probably introduce it
> sooner than anyone.
>
Change d
On Sat, 13 Oct 2012, Adrian C. wrote:
> I hope there will be enough of us so we can keep patching it for
> future xcb maybe even lua 5.2.
To clarify, those devils from Arch Linux will probably introduce it
sooner than anyone.
--
Adrian C. (anrxc) | anrxc..sysphere.org | PGP ID: D20A0618
PGP
Forgot to cc the list.
- Forwarded message from Ignas Anikevicius -
> Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 18:46:00 +0100
> From: Ignas Anikevicius
> To: Alexander Yakushev
> Subject: Re: Release next major version - how bad could it be?
>
> On 14/10/12 05:12:01 +0300, Alexan
On 10/14/2012 04:52 PM, Uli Schlachter wrote:
So since titlebars are so important, I played around a little. See the
attached screenshot. What you are looking at is git/master plus: 23
files changed, 801 insertions(+), 349 deletions(-) Me being lazy, I
just used the wibox-widget as a (fake) tit
On 12.10.2012 17:47, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12 2012, Uli Schlachter wrote:
>
>> This is where it all started:
>>
>> commit 371ee3e8cc0d7d315e822d4c6f131b068b39f380
>> Author: Julien Danjou
>> Date: Thu Sep 17 15:05:53 2009 +0200
>>
>> titlebar: remove
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ju
Alexander Yakushev wrote:
> On 10/13/2012 11:38 AM, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote:
>> Wrong. I want titlebars and I use awesome (v3.4.13). I'd be pretty
>> unhappy if the next stable release didn't have them.
>>
>> Updating my config files does not bother me. Loosing functionality
>> does.
> OK
Why are users in such a hurry to start using awesome v4? To break the
API first time after 3 years (even today people are still spreading
bullshit how awesome changes every month). You guys will have one active
developer on your favorite window manager?
Indeed I will keep using v3.4 for a bit,
>
> Regards,
>
>
> David
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "Jérôme M. Berger" [mailto:jeber...@free.fr]
> Sent: Saturday, 13 October 2012 7:38 PM
> To: awesome@naquadah.org
> Subject: Re: Release next major version - how bad could it be?
>
Same here - Definitely need title bars!
Regards,
David
-Original Message-
From: "Jérôme M. Berger" [mailto:jeber...@free.fr]
Sent: Saturday, 13 October 2012 7:38 PM
To: awesome@naquadah.org
Subject: Re: Release next major version - how bad could it be?
Alexande
On Fri, Oct 12 2012, Alexander Yakushev wrote:
> So why couldn't this titlebar thing be postponed as well, or even provided
> as a plugin at some point?
The problem, I think, is that current code does not allow to build
titlebar at all, not even as a plugin.
Basic brick should be there so anybody
On 10/13/2012 11:38 AM, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote:
Wrong. I want titlebars and I use awesome (v3.4.13). I'd be pretty
unhappy if the next stable release didn't have them.
Updating my config files does not bother me. Loosing functionality
does.
OK then, does it matter for you if yo
Alexander Yakushev wrote:
> What is so important with those titlebars? I mean everyone (wild guess)
> who wanted titlebars in their WM had already moved to Openbox or
> something; or at least they use their own half-baked titlebars.
Wrong. I want titlebars and I use awesome (v3.4.13). I'd
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 2:39 AM, Alexander Yakushev
wrote:
>
> Falling back on incorrect config is nice, but there still have to be some
> informative message why this happened (most users don't read mailing lists
> to know that configuration format has changed).
As a (noobie) user who DOES read
Urgh. We never did something like that before and I surely hope that most users
use the awesome version from their distro. So something that runs during "make
install" wouldn't help them.
Also, awesome falls back to the default config when loading the config produces
errors, so this shouldn't be
On Fri, Oct 12 2012, Uli Schlachter wrote:
> This is where it all started:
>
> commit 371ee3e8cc0d7d315e822d4c6f131b068b39f380
> Author: Julien Danjou
> Date: Thu Sep 17 15:05:53 2009 +0200
>
> titlebar: remove
>
> Signed-off-by: Julien Danjou
So this is how you want to handle this? N
Evening,
On 12.10.2012 16:30, Alexander Yakushev wrote:
> This question have already been raised a few times, both on the list and
> in the bugtracker. I understand that the problem lies in incompatibility
> of current git/master version with old configuration files.
No, it doesn't. We never ma
23 matches
Mail list logo
