THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#655 - weird tagging problem
User who did this - saucerful (saucerful)
--
oops, i meant mod+shift+#
--
More information can be found at the following URL:
http://awesome.naquadah.org/bugs/
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
A new Flyspray task has been opened. Details are below.
User who did this - saucerful (saucerful)
Attached to Project - awesome
Summary - weird tagging problem
Task Type - Bug Report
Category - Tags
Status - Unconfirmed
Assigned To -
Operating Sy
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
A new Flyspray task has been opened. Details are below.
User who did this - Lukas Hrazky (lukash)
Attached to Project - awesome
Summary - Rule fullscreen = true won't make the client go fullscreen
Task Type - Bug Report
Category - Core
Status - Un
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 09:23:29 +0200 (CEST) Julien Danjou
wrote:
> Sounds reasonable.
Ok.
> Don't waste your time on the C part, it's going to be killed at some
> point.
Ok, I hope it will be soon... because it will really be a confusing bug.
lukash
PS: sorry for the tripple post, I just could
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 03:16:43 +0200 (CEST) Gregor Best
wrote:
> In the previous version of widget layouts, i worked around that problem
> by getting a sorted table with the keys and then using ipairs to iterate
> over the table of keys. IMHO having widgets at non-numeric indexes helps
> organizing
At 1255125266 time_t, Lukas Hrazky wrote:
> Permission to switch to ipairs, fix the widgets that have nonnumeric keys and
> state that widgets in layouted tables can only be indexed by numbers. Since
> the order matters in layouts and you can't rely on pairs order at all, I see
> this as the onl
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:45:23 +0200 (CEST) Julien Danjou
wrote:
> So I made a couple of tests to see how it works, and actually I'm quite
> impressed, because it works very well.
Thanks, I'm quite happy with it too :)
> I'm ok to merge this all into next, I just need you to:
> - Give a look at
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:45:23 +0200 (CEST) Julien Danjou
wrote:
> So I made a couple of tests to see how it works, and actually I'm quite
> impressed, because it works very well.
Thanks, I'm quite happy with it too :)
> I'm ok to merge this all into next, I just need you to:
> - Give a look at t
