At 1250949295 time_t, Uli Schlachter wrote:
> PANIC: unprotected error in call to Lua API (bad argument #0 (image expected,
> got table))
This one fixed with:
commit 8ec4f93a3a4c1f5f4ff820b0a24d929860d23b9f
Author: Julien Danjou
Date: Sat Aug 22 16:28:31 2009 +0200
property: do not pop ic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Julien Danjou wrote:
> At 1250936484 time_t, Uli Schlachter wrote:
>> technically it's not next anymore, but konqueror still makes it segfault. The
>> last crash I reported was when opening / closing konqueror windows, this one
>> happened when loadi
At 1250936484 time_t, Uli Schlachter wrote:
> technically it's not next anymore, but konqueror still makes it segfault. The
> last crash I reported was when opening / closing konqueror windows, this one
> happened when loading a new page.
>
> Oh, and I know that the backtrace isn't really useful m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
technically it's not next anymore, but konqueror still makes it segfault. The
last crash I reported was when opening / closing konqueror windows, this one
happened when loading a new page.
Oh, and I know that the backtrace isn't really useful m
At 1250785030 time_t, Uli Schlachter wrote:
> awful.menu broke. I can activate items by clicking, but hovering doesnt expand
> sub-menus or change the background color anymore.
Fixed.
> Oh and why did this break: client.focus = c ; c:raise()? That's the (only) lua
> error in that file.
It, shoul
At 1250524533 time_t, Julien Danjou wrote:
> Can some of you test the 'next' branch?
I still need some testing. Gregor reported that it was ok for him, but
that's not enough for me to merge. However if no one dares to test you
will have all bugs into master and will not be allowed to cry.
Side no
At 1250614411 time_t, Uli Schlachter wrote:
> I was using key() and button() instead of their awful.*() version -> break.
Yeah, I forgot some compat code. I've added some more, but it's not that
good IMHO. But it's the best I can do without losing too much time on
that issue.
> tag() break, does
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Julien Danjou wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Can some of you test the 'next' branch?
> It seems ready to merge, but there's always a chance I missed some bugs,
> of course. I'd like to have at least a couple of review before I merge
> into master.
I didn't
Hi guys,
Can some of you test the 'next' branch?
It seems ready to merge, but there's always a chance I missed some bugs,
of course. I'd like to have at least a couple of review before I merge
into master.
Thanks,
--
Julien Danjou
// ᐰhttp://julien.danjou.info
// 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C9
