Re: [PATCH] Functions for extended table inspection (gears.debug)

2012-03-26 Thread Uli Schlachter
On 25.03.2012 22:21, Alexander Yakushev wrote: > On 03/25/2012 10:11 PM, Uli Schlachter wrote: >> Perhaps these should be called "dump"? > Good enough for me. I'll be renaming it locally to something shorted anyway. >> Personally, I'd prefer: >> >>shift = (shift or "") .. " " >> >> (Because th

Re: [PATCH] Functions for extended table inspection (gears.debug)

2012-03-25 Thread Alexander Yakushev
On 03/25/2012 10:11 PM, Uli Schlachter wrote: Perhaps these should be called "dump"? Good enough for me. I'll be renaming it locally to something shorted anyway. Personally, I'd prefer: shift = (shift or "") .. " " (Because the two spaces are repeated one time less) Yes, this one is bett

Re: [PATCH] Functions for extended table inspection (gears.debug)

2012-03-25 Thread Uli Schlachter
On 16.03.2012 21:07, Alexander Yakushev wrote: > I'm a bit tired of carrying these around my machines so it would be nice > to see them in gears.debug. It is cold and empty there anyway. Hehe. :-) > The function names should definitely be changed. I use "d" because it is > easy to write, but pe

[PATCH] Functions for extended table inspection (gears.debug)

2012-03-16 Thread Alexander Yakushev
I'm a bit tired of carrying these around my machines so it would be nice to see them in gears.debug. It is cold and empty there anyway. The function names should definitely be changed. I use "d" because it is easy to write, but perhaps something more comprehensible might do better. >From fec099