Re: [PATCH] Cleanup AWT peer interfaces

2008-09-17 Thread Mario Torre
Il giorno mer, 17/09/2008 alle 18.24 +0400, Andrei V. Dmitriev ha scritto: > I like that stuff! > Isn't it reasonable to push that into JDK7? Sure! > I'll file a defect and send CR number in a separate message. > Thanks, >Andrei :) If I can suggest, is it possible that this time we have the r

Re: EventQueue changes

2008-09-17 Thread Oleg Sukhodolsky
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Artem Ananiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Oleg Sukhodolsky wrote: >>> >>> 1. A single lock is introduced to handle all the EQ operations like push, >>> pop, getNextEvent, etc. instead of locking all EQ objects one by one, if >>> several. >> >> this change is bac

Re: EventQueue changes

2008-09-17 Thread Oleg Sukhodolsky
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 1:03 PM, Artem Ananiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Oleg Sukhodolsky wrote: >>> >>> 3. pumpEvents() API is made public, probably with some minor changes. >> >> what use cases you want to address by this new API? > > There are several tens of votes for all the related bugs.

Re: [PATCH] Cleanup AWT peer interfaces

2008-09-17 Thread Andrei V. Dmitriev
I like that stuff! Isn't it reasonable to push that into JDK7? Sure! I'll file a defect and send CR number in a separate message. Thanks, Andrei Roman Kennke wrote: Also see the webrevs to this patch: http://kennke.org/~roman/webrev/cleanpeers/webrev/ /Roman Am Dienstag, den 16.09.2008, 12: