On 19/05/2014 07:53, Paul Sandoz wrote:
If i don't have permission to push to the client repo (which might be likely) i
will need to hand over the patch to yourself or Sergey to commit. And i presume
this will have to be a separate issue.
If you do decide to split this then it will require crea
Hi Phil,
On 5/16/2014 9:12 PM, Phil Race wrote:
I think Jim was looking at this. I am not sure if you yet answered all
his questions/concerns.
There's a lot of API here and it will take more time than I have right
now just to get
my head around it so do not expect a quick answer.
1. Why
Hi,
Please review the changeset for bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8043131
The webrev is here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8043131/webrev.00/
This is one more batch of functional AWT (ShapedAndTranslucentWindows
and GC) tests are ought to be moved to regression tree.
--
Th
Hello,
Could you review the fix:
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036110
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8036110/webrev.00
This is a regression from the fix 7092551 where the EDIT control has
been changed to the RICHEDIT.
GetScrollInfo(hWnd, SB_HORZ, &scrollin
Hello, Alexander.
Can you check that the test works correctly on linux/osx.
On 19.05.2014 19:05, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote:
Hello,
Could you review the fix:
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036110
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8036110/webrev.00
This is a reg
On 5/19/2014 12:50 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 19/05/2014 07:53, Paul Sandoz wrote:
If i don't have permission to push to the client repo (which might be
likely) i will need to hand over the patch to yourself or Sergey to
commit. And i presume this will have to be a separate issue.
If you do dec
Hi Omair,
common/autoconf/libraries.m4
624 [use libjpeg from build system or OpenJDK source (system, bundled)
@<:bundled@:>@])])
"@<:bundled@:>@" should read "@<:@bundled@:>@" - note the missing @.
make/lib/Awt2dLibraries.gmk
1236 LIBJPEG_CFLAGS := $(JDK_TOPDIR)/src/share/native
I hereby nominate David DeHaven (OpenJDK user name: ddehaven) for jdk9
Committer
David has contributed a number of patches to JDK 7u, 8, 8u, and 9. Also,
he has reviewed many fixes that went into those releases. The AWT Group
particularly values his deep expertise in Mac OS X, which helped us
Vote: YES.
With best regards. Petr.
On May 19, 2014, at 11:51 PM, Anthony Petrov wrote:
> I hereby nominate David DeHaven (OpenJDK user name: ddehaven) for jdk9
> Committer
>
> David has contributed a number of patches to JDK 7u, 8, 8u, and 9. Also, he
> has reviewed many fixes that went int
Vote: yes
Cheers,
Mario
Il 19/mag/2014 21:53 "Anthony Petrov" ha
scritto:
> I hereby nominate David DeHaven (OpenJDK user name: ddehaven) for jdk9
> Committer
>
> David has contributed a number of patches to JDK 7u, 8, 8u, and 9. Also,
> he has reviewed many fixes that went into those releases.
Vote: Yes
Cheers,
Henry
On 05/19/2014 12:51 PM, Anthony Petrov wrote:
I hereby nominate David DeHaven (OpenJDK user name: ddehaven) for jdk9
Committer
David has contributed a number of patches to JDK 7u, 8, 8u, and 9. Also,
he has reviewed many fixes that went into those releases. The AWT Grou
On 5/16/14 11:04 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
> On 5/16/14 10:45 AM, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote:
>> On 5/16/2014 7:15 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>>> On 5/16/14 6:45 AM, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote:
Hi Peter,
Is there any difference between AccessibleAWTFocusHandler and
AccessibleFoc
Vote: yes
Naoto
On 5/19/26 H, 12:51 PM, Anthony Petrov wrote:
I hereby nominate David DeHaven (OpenJDK user name: ddehaven) for jdk9
Committer
David has contributed a number of patches to JDK 7u, 8, 8u, and 9. Also,
he has reviewed many fixes that went into those releases. The AWT Group
partic
Vote: yes
-Brent
On 5/19/14 12:51 PM, Anthony Petrov wrote:
I hereby nominate David DeHaven (OpenJDK user name: ddehaven) for jdk9
Committer
David has contributed a number of patches to JDK 7u, 8, 8u, and 9. Also,
he has reviewed many fixes that went into those releases. The AWT Group
particul
Vote: yes
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 9:51 PM, Anthony Petrov
wrote:
> I hereby nominate David DeHaven (OpenJDK user name: ddehaven) for jdk9
> Committer
>
> David has contributed a number of patches to JDK 7u, 8, 8u, and 9. Also, he
> has reviewed many fixes that went into those releases. The AWT G
Vote: yes
-weijun
On May 20, 2014, at 3:51, Anthony Petrov wrote:
> I hereby nominate David DeHaven (OpenJDK user name: ddehaven) for jdk9
> Committer
On May 19, 2014, at 6:18 PM, Phil Race wrote:
> On 5/19/2014 12:50 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> On 19/05/2014 07:53, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>>> If i don't have permission to push to the client repo (which might be
>>> likely) i will need to hand over the patch to yourself or Sergey to commit.
>>> An
17 matches
Mail list logo
