Sorry. I meant it is not guaranteed to be sent by every WM.
On 10/6/2015 9:03 AM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
In is extended event. In does not guaranteed to be sent by any WM.
On 10/5/2015 6:12 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Why we cannot treat such a XA_NET_FRAME_EXTENTS as a ConfigureNotify
in which
In is extended event. In does not guaranteed to be sent by any WM.
On 10/5/2015 6:12 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Why we cannot treat such a XA_NET_FRAME_EXTENTS as a ConfigureNotify
in which only insets are changed, and the window bounds/insets should
be revalidated?
On 05.10.15 14:56, Semyon
A few notes:
- Typo in the header of the test: "Copyright (c) 20015", also please
dispose the window before "throw new RuntimeException"
- FocusEvent.java: some of the new javadoc overlap the 80 chars per
line, also remove double spaces in the text.
- I wonder about serialization, the new field
The fix looks good to me.
Thanks,
Alexandr.
On 10/5/2015 6:16 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Looks fine.
On 05.10.15 17:44, mikhail cherkasov wrote:
I reverted removing of "text/uri":
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mcherkas/8086038/webrev.02/
it doesn't relate to original fix, so we can go wit
Looks fine.
On 05.10.15 17:44, mikhail cherkasov wrote:
I reverted removing of "text/uri":
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mcherkas/8086038/webrev.02/
it doesn't relate to original fix, so we can go without this change.
Please file a bug to not forget this cleanup.
On 10/5/2015 17:10, Sergey Byl
Why we cannot treat such a XA_NET_FRAME_EXTENTS as a ConfigureNotify in
which only insets are changed, and the window bounds/insets should be
revalidated?
On 05.10.15 14:56, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Please review fix for JDK9:
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036915
webrev
Hi,
is nobody able to answer my question?
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2015-September/010037.html
Regards,
Steve
Diese E-Mail wurde versandt im Auftrag des Unternehmens Intergraph Ges.m.b.H.
Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Maximilian Weber
Sitz der Gesellschaft
I reverted removing of "text/uri":
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mcherkas/8086038/webrev.02/
it doesn't relate to original fix, so we can go without this change.
On 10/5/2015 17:10, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
On 01.10.15 17:22, mikhail cherkasov wrote:
On 9/30/2015 18:48, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hi,
On 01.10.15 17:22, mikhail cherkasov wrote:
On 9/30/2015 18:48, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hi, Mikhail.
Why you have removed "text/uri" from the flavormap.properties?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mcherkas/8086038/webrev.01/src/java.datatransfer/macosx/classes/sun/datatransfer/resources/flavormap.pro
Hello,
Could you review the fix:
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8137571
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8137571/webrev.00
This is an initial part of the HiDPI Graphics support on Linux for
the JEP 263: HiDPI Graphics on Windows and Linux
http://openjdk.jav
On 05.10.15 15:03, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Sergey, any other thoughts?
I suggest to postpone the fix as discussed in private(latest massage was
added to the CR).
On 9/28/2015 12:43 PM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 9/27/2015 1:13 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
My understanding according to th
Sergey, any other thoughts?
On 9/28/2015 12:43 PM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 9/27/2015 1:13 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
My understanding according to the new javadoc:
"* If the window does transfer focus to other
* heavyweight containers and the synchronous lightweight focus requests
* are
Hello,
Please review fix for JDK9:
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8036915
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssadetsky/8036915/webrev.00/
The test scenario attached to the jira contains potential errors because
Componet.getLocation() won't return the location at any moment of t
Sorry; wrong subject...
On 10/5/2015 2:12 PM, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the fix for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8138838
Patch + webrev zipped + specdiff report:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8138838
Just some cosmetic changes for docs (... ->
Hello,
Could you please review the fix for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8138838
Patch + webrev zipped + specdiff report:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8138838
Just some cosmetic changes for docs (... -> {@code ...}
replacement) + some misprints fixed.
Not sure if these cha
Hi All,
Please find the updated webrev at:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pchopra/8136592/webrev.01/
Regards,
Renjith.
-Original Message-
From: Yuri Nesterenko
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 5:20 PM
To: Renjith Alexander; awt-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: [awt-dev] Request for A
16 matches
Mail list logo
