I didn't mean a bug in the test. I meant it reads to me like there was a
product bug
found by the test except the test wasn't reporting it correctly.
If you say otherwise that is fine .. but you might want to check with
the submitter of
the bug first.
-phil.
On 10/18/2016 10:28 AM, Andrey
Looks like there is no other test bug. Checked configurations:
latest MacOS with HiDPI, 9b140 (green rectangle is shown)
Ubuntu 16.10, same machine, booting from flash drive. But I can try with
KDE or some other DE with HiDPI support.
14.10.2016 20:34, Phil Race пишет:
> This fix resolves
Hello,
Please review fix for JDK9:
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8167652
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssadetsky/8167652/webrev.00/
In Linux, when a frame or dilalog is made resizable or non-resizable the
window decoration need to be updated. For that purpose window is
+1
I also suggest to file a bug to specify "null" behavior for the new
methods. In some cases we already do this, in some not.
On 18.10.16 14:15, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
+1
--Semyon
On 18.10.2016 14:13, Alexander Zvegintsev wrote:
Updated the "behavior is undefined" section:
+1
--Semyon
On 18.10.2016 14:13, Alexander Zvegintsev wrote:
Updated the "behavior is undefined" section:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~azvegint/jdk/9/8166594/01/
Thanks,
Alexander.
On 10/6/16 6:14 PM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 10/6/2016 3:38 PM, Alexander Zvegintsev wrote:
Hi Semyon,
Updated the "behavior is undefined" section:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~azvegint/jdk/9/8166594/01/
Thanks,
Alexander.
On 10/6/16 6:14 PM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 10/6/2016 3:38 PM, Alexander Zvegintsev wrote:
Hi Semyon,
Yes it is, Microsoft defined some set of rules for such case[0].
