Re: RFR: [12] JDK-8196681: Java Access Bridge logging and debug flags dynamically controlled

One thing, since you are passing va_list as the last parameter, shouldn't all fprintf be actually vfprintf? Regards Prasanta On 14-Sep-18 12:55 AM, Krishna Addepalli wrote: Hi All, Enhancement: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8196681 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kaddepalli/81

Re: [12] Review Request: 8210692 The "com.sun.awt.SecurityWarning" class can be dropped

On 9/13/18 2:43 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote: Hello. Please review fix for jdk12. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8210692 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8210692/webrev.00 CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8210693 Thus change looks okay to me.  This class is n

Re: [12] Review Request: 8210692 The "com.sun.awt.SecurityWarning" class can be dropped

I'd guess that security-dev would have reviewers for the change to default.policy. Cc'd. s'marks On 9/13/18 2:43 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote: Hello. Please review fix for jdk12. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8210692 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8210692/webrev.00 CSR:

[12] Review Request: 8210692 The "com.sun.awt.SecurityWarning" class can be dropped

Hello. Please review fix for jdk12. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8210692 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8210692/webrev.00 CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8210693 The client code has a "com.sun.awt.SecurityWarning" class which at some point in the past, J

RFR: [12] JDK-8196681: Java Access Bridge logging and debug flags dynamically controlled

Hi All, Enhancement: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8196681 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kaddepalli/8196681/webrev00/ Please review an enhancement for supporting the logging of Java Access Bridge, so that customers/users facing problems with Accessibility can turn on/off